Language seems to have a dual character; while applying Definition, it holds deeper Meanings in secret. Words are the carriers of both aspects, when we break words down, we see their story.
This is all very good and interesting but once I read down to blavatsky I became disgusted.. Anyways Id just like to say I think the egyptian word is either coincidence or goes back to qn older language probably would look at aramaic If I were you not hebrew. Jesus actually spoke aramaic himself its the oldest language but ashkenaz was a son of japheth who was a son of noah.
There's no evidence that 'Jesus', a Hellenic name, ever spoke Aramaic. The parables that are supposedly direct quotes use Greek tropes, puns that only work in Greek. The first evidence of 'Jesus' is written in Greek, post 70 CE, the circular argument of the gospels. 85% of the sayings attributed to 'Jesus' have been voted by an int'l conference of Bible scholars to be unlikely or impossible, because they'd already been said by other people or describe things in the past that wouldn't have happened by that time, or don't make sense geographically or in context.
Very interesting that Ashkenaz was a son of Jepheth. I didn't remember seeing that in the lineage. What I find is "The sons of Japheth: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshek and Tiras."
There actually is quite a bit in my understanding and I heard its in the new testament somewhere that some pharisees or otherwise at one point mocked christ for having a country bumpkin galilean accent I cant be bothered to look it up for you though sorry but gen 10: 2-5 is the other verse he was the great grandson of noah rather than the grandson.
2 The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.
3 And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.
4 And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim.
5 By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.
This doesn't negate Nef's point that Nazi was derived from Ashkenazi and Nasi as ruler. It's interesting that Japheth's lineage is given the right to rule over the Gentiles, according this story, and 'the isles of the Gentiles' are divided between Gomer and Javan. If the heir is listed first, that means that Ashkenaz rules some of the Gentile isles and Elishah the others.
When you say 'Christ' I'm assuming you mean the fictional character Jesus, whose name doesn't exist in Aramaic. Why would you take a comment by another fictional character in a fictional story to be 'proof'? Biblical scholars have found that there's not even evidence of Q or an ur-text in Aramaic. And if the things that are direct quotes from 'Jesus' only work in Greek, how is that possible if 'Jesus' was speaking Aramaic to Galilean peasants?
This is an epic exploration, Nefahotep. Have I said recently how proud I am to be associated with you? Thanks for mentioning my theory with Abdi Shirta, the first Apiru or Hapiru or Hebrew.
It's a curious thing that the word heir reverses from hierarchy. I don't know what it means but it seems significant. I've been listening to Rurik Skywalker's interviews of Laurent Guyenot, author of From Yahweh to Zion: https://slavlandchronicles.substack.com/p/the-10th-century-great-reset-w-laurent. He thinks that Rome was actually a vassal of Greece, because Rome itself is a Greek word, and they make the connection to Jacob/ IsRaEl usurping the inheritance from Esau. Interesting, eh?
And I don't know if I mentioned to you or Rhonda that Ha'amurabi aka Ham first encoded corporal punishment aka state-authorized torture. Rhonda decodes his name as Abram + Ham.
The fasci still seems like a sinister symbol, where the joining of individuals has been made into a weapon of violence. That Axe is so creepy and its presence in the Supreme Court makes me shudder. I'm doing some further research into corruption in that system and pedo-predators and, although the subject is so dark, the company couldn't be better.
And angels and archons and archangels ... I thought angels meant messengers but I think that's another diversion, I thought archangels were the spies and messengers of the archons. But perhaps its the archons themselves below the pseudo-gods who were 'deified.'
And I woke up thinking that we should be talking about pseudo-Satanic rituals, etc. To say that the Bible has turned things upside down isn't to say that Satan is a god or supernatural deity anymore than Yahweh is or Baal or Osiris or Horus. These are all ways to either exalt or curse mere men as not born of women--and therefore already corrupted--but sprung from the Godhead.
Rome as a vassal of Greece? There was no politically united Ancient Greece as far as I know. Though there's something related I found out recently. Demaratus of Corinth (one of the strongest Mediterranean maritime states around the time of Rome's founding), appears to be the forefather of several Roman kings and oligarchs.
Also, does anyone know of (possible) etymological connections between Nasi and Nabi (the second appears to mean prophet)? The last king of Sparta is interestingly named Nabis, and mainstream history has him die in a too awkward of a way. He is also the son of a Demaratus (or claimed to be).
I'm not well versed into this kind of connections, but if anyone's interested I have some insights here (especially in the footnotes):
Hello, Cassandra (also what I named my youngest as 'the one who can tell the future in a way that will be heard. TBD ;-)
That Greece was who 'ruled from behind' while Rome governed in front was news to me too. You'd have to hear their evidence to entertain the possibility. I'm eager to order the book From Yahweh to Zion or look Laurent Guyenot up on Unz Review. They also say that there are 300 years of the first millennium missing from history, so the dating system has been changed, according to several scholars. That was news to me too.
Not my real name, but it will be nice if she has the opposite effect to Cassandra:)
Wasn't really impressed by the podcast, after listening to over an hour of it. Some of the arguments hold merit, and perhaps others as well (I would have to look more into them), but the overall connections seem too extreme to me, and we would have to completely disregard most of classical and medieval history and archeology to a point that I can't see as reasonable. Other arguments are clearly wrong or too authoritarian, like "Greco-Roman power/civilization shifting from the east to the west then back just makes no sense" (or something to that effect). Or "medieval Rome had mostly medieval architecture so Rome wasn't ancient" (or something to that effect). "We're told the Slavs appear in the 10th century" (actually, no, we're not). The Scythians predate the Cossacks by like a thousand years, and there's too many steppe tribes in between, not so reasonable to claim they're the same people. Anatolian Turks and Hungarians were warrior "elites" mixing with conquered majorities, so comparing the looks of modern Turks/Hungarians to Chinese(!) to make a point is too ignorant (or dishonest). East Romans called Hellenistic is indescribable, they purged almost everything Hellenistic. And too many more.
They both sound too much of people with an agenda for me to trust. Mixing every source or revisionist idea that fits a narrative, while much of it makes no sense. I've also had a substack exchange with Rurik. I didn't like his racist generalizations and his defense of them was too dishonest and disrespectful. https://substack.com/@cassandrafartsback/note/c-51664410
Guyenot seems somewhat less dogmatic but still said much of what I noted above.
Maybe I'm still too attached to mainstream history, I don't want to be arrogant. Might check on some of their more interesting claims at some point, but the overall thing made me rather distrustful.
I think what we're missing from "Eastern Rome's" dark ages (far less than Rurik claims) has a lot to do with the brutal enforcement of Christianity over the Pagans, and it's necessary (and almost successful) cover-up. The Flavian connection that leads up to Constantine makes a lot of sense to me. I think I've read a post of yours on Atwill's work, which I find very interesting.
That is a vicious series of replies by Rurik to your comment. I wasn't sure if you were saying that Blake was racist or Jasun or Rurik? No matter, his retorts were adolescent name-calling. May I quote from that exchange in an upcoming post? Another of my readers, who had first recommended Guyenot's book to me, listened to this interview and wrote:
"I didn't want to be negative when commenting to you about his interviews, but in listening to them, particularly this last linked one, I intuitively felt he was trying to discredit Guyenot by leading him into questions he didn't have answers to. Why not inquire more into his knowledge, which is vast. I now smell a devious rat with Rurik. I'll also add this. The psychopath has absolutely NO common sense, and what he said proves that. One doctor said about psychopaths, "they'll even shit in their own nest." Anyway, thank you for sharing this, as well. I didn't subscribe to him b/c of my intuition, but then I've read two of Guyenot's books. If and when you do, you will see, too."
What I had quoted to her was Rurik's scathing rebuff of free subs, which I got the day after I subbed him. So I'll quote that on my episode too. But I've now ordered Guyenot's books, so I can separate the two.
Oh and yes, I became friends with Joe Atwill in doing my own biblical research. His book on Caesar's Messiah turned around a lot of my thinking.
I mostly meant this towards Rurik, for the quote and his "Christianity is a psyop against Europeans", like north Africa and parts of Asia weren't also initially affected, before much of the world as well. I've noticed other similar things by him, and didn't read the rest of Jasun's post. Feel free to quote, it's things I've said in public.
I more or less agree with your friend's observation. Also noticed Rurik frequently starting with assertions that Guyenot felt he had to tone down. But I think Guyenot also said some similarly over the top things himself.
I've only seen the Caesar's Messiah doc and some interviews. He gives by far the most reasonable explanation to things I've long suspected. I've written a post with some historical background that might be a good introduction to someone new to the subject: https://cassandrafartsback.substack.com/p/from-seleucid-judea-to-imperial-roman
The second doc (and book) in the link, Creating Christ, is also in a similar path, with a different approach, studying religious symbols. But it's main author was among the people who raged on Atwill for "antisemitism" after he wrote an essay on the occult connections of the Nazis, which btw I can't access online. The site (postflaviana) seems blocked, at least from Greece.
You are very clearly seeking the truth as much as possible. I have heard of Rurik, I think I'll do my best to avoid him.
One of the best experiences I'm having in sifting through the history is having people such as yourself engaging in these conversations, sharing insight. I am grateful for that.
Thanks for the reply, Ernesto, and for liking my other comment. Funny, I had just been trying to find where Magog was in the lineage for another purpose, and there it was in my comment! The world works in mysterious ways ;-)
Yes, I'm now in the middle of reading Guyenot. I just finished the chapter 'The Last Hero' where he talks about Jesus, and he and I part ways on that, since I think Jesus was an extension of the psyops into a more hidden form.
Yes, I know what you mean about keeping your cool. I've found that it helps to have this good company of people who are figuring out the truth. I know it's not just me who sees it.
I'm honored by any way in which you give me your attention, Ernesto. I don't monetize anywhere so being heard or read is always a gift from you to me. Thank you for that.
"the mark in the middle of the belly where the umbilical cord was attached in the fetus," Middle English navele, from Old English nafela, nabula, from Proto-Germanic *nabalan (source also of Old Norse nafli, Danish and Swedish navle, Old Frisian navla, Middle Dutch and Dutch navel, Old High German nabalo, German Nabel), from PIE *(o)nobh- "navel" (source also of Sanskrit nabhila "navel, nave, relationship;" Avestan nafa "navel," naba-nazdishta "next of kin;" Persian naf; Latin umbilicus "navel;"
Old Prussian nabis "navel;" Greek omphalos; Old Irish imbliu). For Romanic words, see umbilicus.
The cords of all link back, strandentwining cable of all flesh. [Joyce, "Ulysses"]
"Navel" words from other roots include Lithuanian bamba, Sanskrit bimba- (also "disk, sphere"), Greek bembix, literally "whirlpool." Old Church Slavonic papuku, Lithuanian pumpuras are originally "bud." Considered a feminine sexual center since ancient times, and still in parts of the Middle East, India, and Japan. In medieval Europe, it was averred that "[t]he seat of wantonness in women is the navel" [Cambridge bestiary, C.U.L. ii.4.26]. Words for it in most languages have a secondary sense of "center."
Meaning "center or hub of a country" is attested in English from late 14c. To contemplate (one's) navel "meditate" is from 1933; hence navel-gazer (by 1947); see also omphaloskepsis. Navel orange is attested from 1831.
My thinking is Nabis = Nobile, or it's atavistic word root. Some more digging may turn up more on "Nabis."
Interesting, since it appears as if Nabis rises to power out of nowhere (same as the previous two Spartan Kings), and I find quite likely that he was from the beginning working with/for Antiochus III of the Seleucids, and his name seems more Eastern/Semitic than Greek. I think there's no other Greek with that name. Perhaps he's Antiochus' navel/connection to Greece and the prophet/savior for the turmoiled Spartans?
Then Antiochus comes to fight the Romans in Greece with just 10500 men, while he controls almost everything from Asia Minor to India. His only Greek allies are Sparta and the Aetolians.The Aetolians alledgely assasinate their ally Nabis just before Antiochus lands in Greece. While the Romans and allies (almost) seem to be lurking out of Sparta ready to capture it when he dies. That's just a brief overview.
The rise of Rome seems as weird and rewritten as much of modern history.
From just an observer perspective, the pattern of writing and recording our history appears to follow the bias of the victor. There's a lot of deception that has occurred in more recent history.
The media today will try to write about our current conflicts in a very different way than how we observed it.
The migrants into the US will be painted as "those seeking shelter from a terrible native home country." They won't mention the bags of cash each young fighting age male is being given for joining the caravan going to the US. I am also sure nobody will record the video of those young men, talking about coming to use "squatters rights" protection laws in the US to Take homes from American Families either.
On the example I gave it doesn't even fully follow the bias of the victor. Sources usually exaggerate their opponent's strength. But the "king of kings/king of Asia" arriving with just 10k men and losing to superior Roman forces is weird even in that sense.
If painted as "those seeking shelter from a terrible native home country" it will be sad indeed. If painted as victims of the globalist empire in similar ways as the rest of us, it would be more reasonable to me.
Not sure exactly on what's the end goal though. Perhaps some of them are (somewhat) willing/aware accomplices, but if I paint all migrants in that light, I first have to paint us westerners as worse for tolerating and/or benefiting from colonialism and imperialism for way too long.
I don't mean all migrants. I personally know some people who are from Mexico. They say that if the US keeps letting unknown people in, they want to leave and go back. My comment centers around the fighting age male cohorts, one of them having made a video, encouraging others to come and just "take" people's homes. I realize there are actually people coming who just want a better life too.
It's always a treat to have conversation with you, Tereza. You once said that the Bible has a description of history that is turned inside - out and upside - down. This is true of our language too. I notice that there are some people who are not receptive to this type of exploration of Language.
Satan comes from the celebration of Saturnalia, in ancient Rome, so I wonder if this now traces back further to Greek or Macedonian Culture? I know that the Iconography of Satan that we see today, is a deliberate hijack of the God of the Forrest "Cernunnos."
Agreed on the inside out/ upside-down of language, history and stories. Words are each a story used as a building block to tell a--I almost wrote larger but in reality, it's the smaller story. The larger story is encapsulated in the word. So if the big stories have been turned inside-out, all of the stories built with them will be reversed. Re-versed. Re is another form of Ra, I think. So even the prefix may mean opposed.
I'd really like to see the original Greek of the gospels and what words were used. We know all the J words are inventions but what word was used that gets translated Satan? Is it related to Set?
Guyenot says that Rome traces back to Hellenist Byzantium, whose history disappears at the time Rome's is most active.
I dont think you have it quite right but very interesting nonetheless. There was a norse God called Satyr I believe as well and in hindu vedic satya is a word for truth as is rta which is cognate to persian zoaroastrian asa aka asha. You know in india you have the asura as devil gods but in norse their is its cognate aesir which is then reversed to the good deities. You see how this is all propaganda going back to ancient times can you find the truth? Also might want to check out the story of manu from india and his fish matsya. Its like a combination of noah and jonah. Curious that manu sounds like man or human which supposedly is latin origin. Or the name immanuel...
I wonder about the connection of Manu to Mennahem of the history of the zealots, and to the story of the trial of 'Jesus' vs Bar Abbus or the Son of Man.
Very interesting connection between Jonah and Noah! It's Noah with that added 'J' that didn't exist in Hebrew and is, I think, the tell for when something's a coded message. And they're both connected to water disasters. Of course!
Interesting to explore the ancient connections. I do have a life long background with Vedic Sanskrit -- Daivi Vak. Can we find the truth? We can carefully recapitulate our own experience of it. Our experience is Subjective, each individual will have a different vantage point with which to view it.
Yes one person I remember was very intelligent I thought in their wording and couldnt reproduce it but it was like idea of an original language like tower of bible and how the forces of evil seek to invert and change language but somehow can never quite change the word to evil just make it more interesting.
A very good examination! Etymology is...er...fascinating!
Although it seems I coined the term, I call everything in the legal system "legalates." They are not Laws, of which there are only three. No One knows the number of legalates "on the books," making the claim, "ignorance of the law is no excuse" a complete absurdity if, by "law," legalates are meant.
The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):
1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
When I first learned these Laws, many decades ago, they were called merely "The Three Laws." But when I did a search on the web, I got laws of robotics, laws of physics, and such. So I asked Myself what these are the Laws of, and "Ethics" stood out clear as day, so I added "of Ethics" to "The Three Laws."
And for a while, when You searched "the three laws of ethics," My work would be returned. Now, of course, We're looking at the grossly castrated web, and even if You ask DuckDuck to find the "three laws of ethics," it will claim that no results are found (with the quotes). (Yandex does bring back My work...)
"Even the term “Nazi”, instead of being short for NAtional soZIalistisch, appears to be derived from “Nasi”, which means Prince in ancient Hebrew."~Article
Exploring word roots and linguistic origins is bullshit? The way history has been taught for quite sometime IS bullshit. Why not question it? In fact, I do question quite a few things and that leads to being able to deal with some of the worst monstrosities.
If we are currently living in a dying country, where the criminals who run it are INTENTIONALLY trying to cull the population with vaccines ---- you wouldn't question that? Or question what they stand for? Hmm quite interesting.
"Exploring word roots and linguistic origins is bullshit?"~Nefhotep
Are you Egyptian?
No it is not necessarily bullshit to explore word roots and linguistic origins. However the origin of the term Nazi is well known:
The first use of the term "Nazi" by the National Socialists occurred in 1926 in a publication by Joseph Goebbels called Der Nazi-Sozi ["The Nazi-Sozi"]. In Goebbels' pamphlet, the word "Nazi" only appears when linked with the word "Sozi" as an abbreviation of "National Socialism".
Your esoteric plunge into the term Nazi is interesting, however it is clear that the official narrative on this matter is correct. I most often dissagree with the official narratives of most critical historical events. sSuch as the absurtd notion that Lee Oswald murdered President John F. Kennedy. Or that the events of 9/11 were perpetrated by Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda. It was clearly a false flag PSYOP perpetrated by the National Security State.
Another official narrative that I do agree with are the Apollo moon landings. We certainly landed men on the moon. The two issues, '9/11' and the 'moon landings' are contingent on physics and astrophysics, and the facts and truth of these events must rely on scientific knowledge.
Your assertions as to the origin of the term 'Nazi' is more nuanced and no doubt a great deal of historical literature is involved. However in this instance Occam's Razor applies directly.
I explained my perspective on my post, if you disagree with me, that's fine.
I do reserve the total right to do my own research and explore what I can. While it looks like we are in agreement on the other items you mention above:
Moon Landing
9-11 false flag
You should acquaint yourself with my other work on Hitler and the Orchestrated planned World Wars.
Nazi, also sounds precisely like Not see. As in do not believe your eyes. Be blind to this. a distinction between Hebrew and non Hebrew Judaists might help to clarify. Just a bit.
Jew or Jewish is a religion, anyone can become a "Jew" and even make it seem their whole family has long been Jewish in a few generations, and that is exactly what our pagan overlords have done to divert us from their real identity. These seem to be the Chabad, Kabbalah, Israeli politicians, and many of the elite who fake being anyone they want. They change genders, family names, swap kids, fake their deaths... They are no more Jewish in a people sense than Biden or Pelosi are American in a people sense. It's the allegiance that is against the common person. The avg American on the street has no clue who is running the world, neither does the average so-called Jewish person in the US or in Israel or anywhere else. The Jesuits and Opus Dei etc may be doing bad things, but your avg catholic on the street has little clue what is running the world. Most people have their head in the dirt, but are not elite nasty people.
You are quite correct, that's why for the most part, I tend to view the culprits of the current world affairs as either the Sabbatean / Frankist or as Black Nobility; not Jews.
The individuals who are orchestrating all that has been going on, are definitely not the common person.
"Fascists and the political Zionists" are only appearing to be in opposite camps though. From what I can tell, Pike is partially correct in that those world wars were in fact, Planned and Orchestrated. From at at least the raw documentation provided in my part 1 about Hitler;
There is clear evidence to show the conflict itself as a form of Kabuki Theater. Also, I do have another post almost ready; having more detail, that shows Hitler was an "Ashkenazi Jew."
Let's not forget that:
1897 - The first Zionist congress, founded by the De Rothschild family after first staging the Dreyfus affair, takes place in August 1897 in Basel. The leader of the Zionist Congress Theodor Herzl wrote in his diary that Zionism is founded on Anti-Semitism.
There's no such thing as a Jewish "race," is there a Muslim one? Is there a Christian "race?"
There's really no such thing as a race, a social construct that is used to divide us. It's really like a make and model of the body. It's primarily used to legitimize those who think they know what your purpose is more than you do.
It's completely irrelevant if Hitler was Jewish; but there is a good reason to evaluate that discussion, there's a lot of political manipulation going on right now. With people, either freely associated together or believing ideological nonsense, to serve an agenda that supports hidden puppet masters. There's much more to focus on in the framework of the Parasites; Jews have only ever been a giant distraction.
The Jewish community is not a monolithic singular one; there are many types of Jews. Within the Jewish community, there has been for quite sometime, a unique Parasitic Culture or Cultural Complex.
The closest way to describe it is, Sabbatean / Frankists. I do have many articles in which I reference them. Generally, the regular Jews are setup as Patsies to take the social and political blame for all the criminal behavior of the real ones; they are what I call the Black Nobility. These are dynastic bloodlines that have had their hammerlock on social, political religious organizations for centuries and by extension, any and all forms of government, corporate trade activity and NGOs. These few individual families also control ALL organized crime; especially pedophile rings, drug and organ harvesting, and trafficking.
The following articles I post awhile ago on the Order of the Garter and the Dragon Court as well as the Corporate Globalist Syndicates describes and diagrams these things out, I think fairly accurately:
This next one was originally written by Frances Leader, which gives an execellent primer of exactly who the Black Nobility really are, in addition it includes some links to other researchers work on identifying precisely who these people are:
PRIN-temp -- when thing GERMinate.
This is all very good and interesting but once I read down to blavatsky I became disgusted.. Anyways Id just like to say I think the egyptian word is either coincidence or goes back to qn older language probably would look at aramaic If I were you not hebrew. Jesus actually spoke aramaic himself its the oldest language but ashkenaz was a son of japheth who was a son of noah.
There's no evidence that 'Jesus', a Hellenic name, ever spoke Aramaic. The parables that are supposedly direct quotes use Greek tropes, puns that only work in Greek. The first evidence of 'Jesus' is written in Greek, post 70 CE, the circular argument of the gospels. 85% of the sayings attributed to 'Jesus' have been voted by an int'l conference of Bible scholars to be unlikely or impossible, because they'd already been said by other people or describe things in the past that wouldn't have happened by that time, or don't make sense geographically or in context.
Very interesting that Ashkenaz was a son of Jepheth. I didn't remember seeing that in the lineage. What I find is "The sons of Japheth: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshek and Tiras."
There actually is quite a bit in my understanding and I heard its in the new testament somewhere that some pharisees or otherwise at one point mocked christ for having a country bumpkin galilean accent I cant be bothered to look it up for you though sorry but gen 10: 2-5 is the other verse he was the great grandson of noah rather than the grandson.
Ah the son of Gomer son of Japheth.
2 The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.
3 And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.
4 And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim.
5 By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.
This doesn't negate Nef's point that Nazi was derived from Ashkenazi and Nasi as ruler. It's interesting that Japheth's lineage is given the right to rule over the Gentiles, according this story, and 'the isles of the Gentiles' are divided between Gomer and Javan. If the heir is listed first, that means that Ashkenaz rules some of the Gentile isles and Elishah the others.
When you say 'Christ' I'm assuming you mean the fictional character Jesus, whose name doesn't exist in Aramaic. Why would you take a comment by another fictional character in a fictional story to be 'proof'? Biblical scholars have found that there's not even evidence of Q or an ur-text in Aramaic. And if the things that are direct quotes from 'Jesus' only work in Greek, how is that possible if 'Jesus' was speaking Aramaic to Galilean peasants?
This is an epic exploration, Nefahotep. Have I said recently how proud I am to be associated with you? Thanks for mentioning my theory with Abdi Shirta, the first Apiru or Hapiru or Hebrew.
It's a curious thing that the word heir reverses from hierarchy. I don't know what it means but it seems significant. I've been listening to Rurik Skywalker's interviews of Laurent Guyenot, author of From Yahweh to Zion: https://slavlandchronicles.substack.com/p/the-10th-century-great-reset-w-laurent. He thinks that Rome was actually a vassal of Greece, because Rome itself is a Greek word, and they make the connection to Jacob/ IsRaEl usurping the inheritance from Esau. Interesting, eh?
And I don't know if I mentioned to you or Rhonda that Ha'amurabi aka Ham first encoded corporal punishment aka state-authorized torture. Rhonda decodes his name as Abram + Ham.
The fasci still seems like a sinister symbol, where the joining of individuals has been made into a weapon of violence. That Axe is so creepy and its presence in the Supreme Court makes me shudder. I'm doing some further research into corruption in that system and pedo-predators and, although the subject is so dark, the company couldn't be better.
And angels and archons and archangels ... I thought angels meant messengers but I think that's another diversion, I thought archangels were the spies and messengers of the archons. But perhaps its the archons themselves below the pseudo-gods who were 'deified.'
And I woke up thinking that we should be talking about pseudo-Satanic rituals, etc. To say that the Bible has turned things upside down isn't to say that Satan is a god or supernatural deity anymore than Yahweh is or Baal or Osiris or Horus. These are all ways to either exalt or curse mere men as not born of women--and therefore already corrupted--but sprung from the Godhead.
Thanks again for this 'definitive' dive.
Rome as a vassal of Greece? There was no politically united Ancient Greece as far as I know. Though there's something related I found out recently. Demaratus of Corinth (one of the strongest Mediterranean maritime states around the time of Rome's founding), appears to be the forefather of several Roman kings and oligarchs.
Also, does anyone know of (possible) etymological connections between Nasi and Nabi (the second appears to mean prophet)? The last king of Sparta is interestingly named Nabis, and mainstream history has him die in a too awkward of a way. He is also the son of a Demaratus (or claimed to be).
I'm not well versed into this kind of connections, but if anyone's interested I have some insights here (especially in the footnotes):
https://cassandrafartsback.substack.com/p/the-sparta-youve-never-heard-about-a26
Hello, Cassandra (also what I named my youngest as 'the one who can tell the future in a way that will be heard. TBD ;-)
That Greece was who 'ruled from behind' while Rome governed in front was news to me too. You'd have to hear their evidence to entertain the possibility. I'm eager to order the book From Yahweh to Zion or look Laurent Guyenot up on Unz Review. They also say that there are 300 years of the first millennium missing from history, so the dating system has been changed, according to several scholars. That was news to me too.
I'm eager to check out your stack!
Not my real name, but it will be nice if she has the opposite effect to Cassandra:)
Wasn't really impressed by the podcast, after listening to over an hour of it. Some of the arguments hold merit, and perhaps others as well (I would have to look more into them), but the overall connections seem too extreme to me, and we would have to completely disregard most of classical and medieval history and archeology to a point that I can't see as reasonable. Other arguments are clearly wrong or too authoritarian, like "Greco-Roman power/civilization shifting from the east to the west then back just makes no sense" (or something to that effect). Or "medieval Rome had mostly medieval architecture so Rome wasn't ancient" (or something to that effect). "We're told the Slavs appear in the 10th century" (actually, no, we're not). The Scythians predate the Cossacks by like a thousand years, and there's too many steppe tribes in between, not so reasonable to claim they're the same people. Anatolian Turks and Hungarians were warrior "elites" mixing with conquered majorities, so comparing the looks of modern Turks/Hungarians to Chinese(!) to make a point is too ignorant (or dishonest). East Romans called Hellenistic is indescribable, they purged almost everything Hellenistic. And too many more.
They both sound too much of people with an agenda for me to trust. Mixing every source or revisionist idea that fits a narrative, while much of it makes no sense. I've also had a substack exchange with Rurik. I didn't like his racist generalizations and his defense of them was too dishonest and disrespectful. https://substack.com/@cassandrafartsback/note/c-51664410
Guyenot seems somewhat less dogmatic but still said much of what I noted above.
Maybe I'm still too attached to mainstream history, I don't want to be arrogant. Might check on some of their more interesting claims at some point, but the overall thing made me rather distrustful.
I think what we're missing from "Eastern Rome's" dark ages (far less than Rurik claims) has a lot to do with the brutal enforcement of Christianity over the Pagans, and it's necessary (and almost successful) cover-up. The Flavian connection that leads up to Constantine makes a lot of sense to me. I think I've read a post of yours on Atwill's work, which I find very interesting.
That is a vicious series of replies by Rurik to your comment. I wasn't sure if you were saying that Blake was racist or Jasun or Rurik? No matter, his retorts were adolescent name-calling. May I quote from that exchange in an upcoming post? Another of my readers, who had first recommended Guyenot's book to me, listened to this interview and wrote:
"I didn't want to be negative when commenting to you about his interviews, but in listening to them, particularly this last linked one, I intuitively felt he was trying to discredit Guyenot by leading him into questions he didn't have answers to. Why not inquire more into his knowledge, which is vast. I now smell a devious rat with Rurik. I'll also add this. The psychopath has absolutely NO common sense, and what he said proves that. One doctor said about psychopaths, "they'll even shit in their own nest." Anyway, thank you for sharing this, as well. I didn't subscribe to him b/c of my intuition, but then I've read two of Guyenot's books. If and when you do, you will see, too."
What I had quoted to her was Rurik's scathing rebuff of free subs, which I got the day after I subbed him. So I'll quote that on my episode too. But I've now ordered Guyenot's books, so I can separate the two.
Oh and yes, I became friends with Joe Atwill in doing my own biblical research. His book on Caesar's Messiah turned around a lot of my thinking.
I mostly meant this towards Rurik, for the quote and his "Christianity is a psyop against Europeans", like north Africa and parts of Asia weren't also initially affected, before much of the world as well. I've noticed other similar things by him, and didn't read the rest of Jasun's post. Feel free to quote, it's things I've said in public.
I more or less agree with your friend's observation. Also noticed Rurik frequently starting with assertions that Guyenot felt he had to tone down. But I think Guyenot also said some similarly over the top things himself.
I've only seen the Caesar's Messiah doc and some interviews. He gives by far the most reasonable explanation to things I've long suspected. I've written a post with some historical background that might be a good introduction to someone new to the subject: https://cassandrafartsback.substack.com/p/from-seleucid-judea-to-imperial-roman
The second doc (and book) in the link, Creating Christ, is also in a similar path, with a different approach, studying religious symbols. But it's main author was among the people who raged on Atwill for "antisemitism" after he wrote an essay on the occult connections of the Nazis, which btw I can't access online. The site (postflaviana) seems blocked, at least from Greece.
You are very clearly seeking the truth as much as possible. I have heard of Rurik, I think I'll do my best to avoid him.
One of the best experiences I'm having in sifting through the history is having people such as yourself engaging in these conversations, sharing insight. I am grateful for that.
I'm trying, thanks for sharing insights and the conversation:)
Thanks for the reply, Ernesto, and for liking my other comment. Funny, I had just been trying to find where Magog was in the lineage for another purpose, and there it was in my comment! The world works in mysterious ways ;-)
Yes, I'm now in the middle of reading Guyenot. I just finished the chapter 'The Last Hero' where he talks about Jesus, and he and I part ways on that, since I think Jesus was an extension of the psyops into a more hidden form.
I've now done a couple of episode that reference Guyenot's work and I'll be putting out one today that responds to the Breggins blocking Nef on their comment thread "Anti-Semitism gets personal," which was about my work. Here are the others: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-hatest-story-ever-told and https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/what-is-a-jew?
Yes, I know what you mean about keeping your cool. I've found that it helps to have this good company of people who are figuring out the truth. I know it's not just me who sees it.
I'm honored by any way in which you give me your attention, Ernesto. I don't monetize anywhere so being heard or read is always a gift from you to me. Thank you for that.
A search for Nabis on https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=nabis == [navel (n.)]
"the mark in the middle of the belly where the umbilical cord was attached in the fetus," Middle English navele, from Old English nafela, nabula, from Proto-Germanic *nabalan (source also of Old Norse nafli, Danish and Swedish navle, Old Frisian navla, Middle Dutch and Dutch navel, Old High German nabalo, German Nabel), from PIE *(o)nobh- "navel" (source also of Sanskrit nabhila "navel, nave, relationship;" Avestan nafa "navel," naba-nazdishta "next of kin;" Persian naf; Latin umbilicus "navel;"
Old Prussian nabis "navel;" Greek omphalos; Old Irish imbliu). For Romanic words, see umbilicus.
The cords of all link back, strandentwining cable of all flesh. [Joyce, "Ulysses"]
"Navel" words from other roots include Lithuanian bamba, Sanskrit bimba- (also "disk, sphere"), Greek bembix, literally "whirlpool." Old Church Slavonic papuku, Lithuanian pumpuras are originally "bud." Considered a feminine sexual center since ancient times, and still in parts of the Middle East, India, and Japan. In medieval Europe, it was averred that "[t]he seat of wantonness in women is the navel" [Cambridge bestiary, C.U.L. ii.4.26]. Words for it in most languages have a secondary sense of "center."
Meaning "center or hub of a country" is attested in English from late 14c. To contemplate (one's) navel "meditate" is from 1933; hence navel-gazer (by 1947); see also omphaloskepsis. Navel orange is attested from 1831.
My thinking is Nabis = Nobile, or it's atavistic word root. Some more digging may turn up more on "Nabis."
Interesting, since it appears as if Nabis rises to power out of nowhere (same as the previous two Spartan Kings), and I find quite likely that he was from the beginning working with/for Antiochus III of the Seleucids, and his name seems more Eastern/Semitic than Greek. I think there's no other Greek with that name. Perhaps he's Antiochus' navel/connection to Greece and the prophet/savior for the turmoiled Spartans?
Then Antiochus comes to fight the Romans in Greece with just 10500 men, while he controls almost everything from Asia Minor to India. His only Greek allies are Sparta and the Aetolians.The Aetolians alledgely assasinate their ally Nabis just before Antiochus lands in Greece. While the Romans and allies (almost) seem to be lurking out of Sparta ready to capture it when he dies. That's just a brief overview.
The rise of Rome seems as weird and rewritten as much of modern history.
From just an observer perspective, the pattern of writing and recording our history appears to follow the bias of the victor. There's a lot of deception that has occurred in more recent history.
The media today will try to write about our current conflicts in a very different way than how we observed it.
The migrants into the US will be painted as "those seeking shelter from a terrible native home country." They won't mention the bags of cash each young fighting age male is being given for joining the caravan going to the US. I am also sure nobody will record the video of those young men, talking about coming to use "squatters rights" protection laws in the US to Take homes from American Families either.
On the example I gave it doesn't even fully follow the bias of the victor. Sources usually exaggerate their opponent's strength. But the "king of kings/king of Asia" arriving with just 10k men and losing to superior Roman forces is weird even in that sense.
If painted as "those seeking shelter from a terrible native home country" it will be sad indeed. If painted as victims of the globalist empire in similar ways as the rest of us, it would be more reasonable to me.
Not sure exactly on what's the end goal though. Perhaps some of them are (somewhat) willing/aware accomplices, but if I paint all migrants in that light, I first have to paint us westerners as worse for tolerating and/or benefiting from colonialism and imperialism for way too long.
I don't mean all migrants. I personally know some people who are from Mexico. They say that if the US keeps letting unknown people in, they want to leave and go back. My comment centers around the fighting age male cohorts, one of them having made a video, encouraging others to come and just "take" people's homes. I realize there are actually people coming who just want a better life too.
It's always a treat to have conversation with you, Tereza. You once said that the Bible has a description of history that is turned inside - out and upside - down. This is true of our language too. I notice that there are some people who are not receptive to this type of exploration of Language.
Satan comes from the celebration of Saturnalia, in ancient Rome, so I wonder if this now traces back further to Greek or Macedonian Culture? I know that the Iconography of Satan that we see today, is a deliberate hijack of the God of the Forrest "Cernunnos."
Thanks for the link, I'll check it out. ;-)
Agreed on the inside out/ upside-down of language, history and stories. Words are each a story used as a building block to tell a--I almost wrote larger but in reality, it's the smaller story. The larger story is encapsulated in the word. So if the big stories have been turned inside-out, all of the stories built with them will be reversed. Re-versed. Re is another form of Ra, I think. So even the prefix may mean opposed.
I'd really like to see the original Greek of the gospels and what words were used. We know all the J words are inventions but what word was used that gets translated Satan? Is it related to Set?
Guyenot says that Rome traces back to Hellenist Byzantium, whose history disappears at the time Rome's is most active.
I dont think you have it quite right but very interesting nonetheless. There was a norse God called Satyr I believe as well and in hindu vedic satya is a word for truth as is rta which is cognate to persian zoaroastrian asa aka asha. You know in india you have the asura as devil gods but in norse their is its cognate aesir which is then reversed to the good deities. You see how this is all propaganda going back to ancient times can you find the truth? Also might want to check out the story of manu from india and his fish matsya. Its like a combination of noah and jonah. Curious that manu sounds like man or human which supposedly is latin origin. Or the name immanuel...
I wonder about the connection of Manu to Mennahem of the history of the zealots, and to the story of the trial of 'Jesus' vs Bar Abbus or the Son of Man.
Very interesting connection between Jonah and Noah! It's Noah with that added 'J' that didn't exist in Hebrew and is, I think, the tell for when something's a coded message. And they're both connected to water disasters. Of course!
And Immanuel, so interesting!
Interesting to explore the ancient connections. I do have a life long background with Vedic Sanskrit -- Daivi Vak. Can we find the truth? We can carefully recapitulate our own experience of it. Our experience is Subjective, each individual will have a different vantage point with which to view it.
Yes one person I remember was very intelligent I thought in their wording and couldnt reproduce it but it was like idea of an original language like tower of bible and how the forces of evil seek to invert and change language but somehow can never quite change the word to evil just make it more interesting.
A very good examination! Etymology is...er...fascinating!
Although it seems I coined the term, I call everything in the legal system "legalates." They are not Laws, of which there are only three. No One knows the number of legalates "on the books," making the claim, "ignorance of the law is no excuse" a complete absurdity if, by "law," legalates are meant.
The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):
1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
When I first learned these Laws, many decades ago, they were called merely "The Three Laws." But when I did a search on the web, I got laws of robotics, laws of physics, and such. So I asked Myself what these are the Laws of, and "Ethics" stood out clear as day, so I added "of Ethics" to "The Three Laws."
And for a while, when You searched "the three laws of ethics," My work would be returned. Now, of course, We're looking at the grossly castrated web, and even if You ask DuckDuck to find the "three laws of ethics," it will claim that no results are found (with the quotes). (Yandex does bring back My work...)
The Simplicity of Ethics (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/the-simplicity-of-ethics
http://ancient-spooks.de/meta-infos/introduction-my-research.html
This is interesting thanks for the link, I'll continue to study it.
"Even the term “Nazi”, instead of being short for NAtional soZIalistisch, appears to be derived from “Nasi”, which means Prince in ancient Hebrew."~Article
Sorry KW, I call 'bullshit' on this one.
\\][//
Exploring word roots and linguistic origins is bullshit? The way history has been taught for quite sometime IS bullshit. Why not question it? In fact, I do question quite a few things and that leads to being able to deal with some of the worst monstrosities.
If we are currently living in a dying country, where the criminals who run it are INTENTIONALLY trying to cull the population with vaccines ---- you wouldn't question that? Or question what they stand for? Hmm quite interesting.
"Exploring word roots and linguistic origins is bullshit?"~Nefhotep
Are you Egyptian?
No it is not necessarily bullshit to explore word roots and linguistic origins. However the origin of the term Nazi is well known:
The first use of the term "Nazi" by the National Socialists occurred in 1926 in a publication by Joseph Goebbels called Der Nazi-Sozi ["The Nazi-Sozi"]. In Goebbels' pamphlet, the word "Nazi" only appears when linked with the word "Sozi" as an abbreviation of "National Socialism".
Your esoteric plunge into the term Nazi is interesting, however it is clear that the official narrative on this matter is correct. I most often dissagree with the official narratives of most critical historical events. sSuch as the absurtd notion that Lee Oswald murdered President John F. Kennedy. Or that the events of 9/11 were perpetrated by Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda. It was clearly a false flag PSYOP perpetrated by the National Security State.
Another official narrative that I do agree with are the Apollo moon landings. We certainly landed men on the moon. The two issues, '9/11' and the 'moon landings' are contingent on physics and astrophysics, and the facts and truth of these events must rely on scientific knowledge.
Your assertions as to the origin of the term 'Nazi' is more nuanced and no doubt a great deal of historical literature is involved. However in this instance Occam's Razor applies directly.
Thank you for your reply.
\\][//
"Are you Egyptian?" --- Does it matter?
I explained my perspective on my post, if you disagree with me, that's fine.
I do reserve the total right to do my own research and explore what I can. While it looks like we are in agreement on the other items you mention above:
Moon Landing
9-11 false flag
You should acquaint yourself with my other work on Hitler and the Orchestrated planned World Wars.
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/adolf-hitler-british-agent-part-1
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/all-wars-are-bankers-wars-part-1
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/all-wars-are-bankers-wars-part-2
"Are you Egyptian?" --- Does it matter?"~Nefahotep
The name certainly sounds like ancient Egyption!
"if you disagree with me, that's fine."~ibid
I do, thank you.
\\][//
Of course it's an Ancient Egyptian name. It's a good name to have;-)
Congratulations!!
\\][//
Che,
I have no interest in your bullshit arguments.
\\][//
Excellent, N!
Nazi, also sounds precisely like Not see. As in do not believe your eyes. Be blind to this. a distinction between Hebrew and non Hebrew Judaists might help to clarify. Just a bit.
Jew or Jewish is a religion, anyone can become a "Jew" and even make it seem their whole family has long been Jewish in a few generations, and that is exactly what our pagan overlords have done to divert us from their real identity. These seem to be the Chabad, Kabbalah, Israeli politicians, and many of the elite who fake being anyone they want. They change genders, family names, swap kids, fake their deaths... They are no more Jewish in a people sense than Biden or Pelosi are American in a people sense. It's the allegiance that is against the common person. The avg American on the street has no clue who is running the world, neither does the average so-called Jewish person in the US or in Israel or anywhere else. The Jesuits and Opus Dei etc may be doing bad things, but your avg catholic on the street has little clue what is running the world. Most people have their head in the dirt, but are not elite nasty people.
You are quite correct, that's why for the most part, I tend to view the culprits of the current world affairs as either the Sabbatean / Frankist or as Black Nobility; not Jews.
The individuals who are orchestrating all that has been going on, are definitely not the common person.
Thanks very much for the informative post today!
Nazi was a slang used by Germans.
I believe it was coined by their opponents and they took it and ran with it.
It always happens this way.
---
By the Way... least we forget the Albert Pike Letter in which the term Nazisim was coined before the 20th century began...
---
"The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the
power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The
divergences caused by the "agentur" (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic
Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used
in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions."
"The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the
Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and
that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine.
During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to
balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we
would need it for the final social cataclysm."
"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the
"agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The
war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism
(the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.
"Fascists and the political Zionists" are only appearing to be in opposite camps though. From what I can tell, Pike is partially correct in that those world wars were in fact, Planned and Orchestrated. From at at least the raw documentation provided in my part 1 about Hitler;
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/adolf-hitler-british-agent-part-1
There is clear evidence to show the conflict itself as a form of Kabuki Theater. Also, I do have another post almost ready; having more detail, that shows Hitler was an "Ashkenazi Jew."
Let's not forget that:
1897 - The first Zionist congress, founded by the De Rothschild family after first staging the Dreyfus affair, takes place in August 1897 in Basel. The leader of the Zionist Congress Theodor Herzl wrote in his diary that Zionism is founded on Anti-Semitism.
Kabuki Theater... yes..
Hitler = Jew = Rothschild... yes.
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/about-adolf-rothschild-hiedler-schickelgruber
There's no such thing as a Jewish "race," is there a Muslim one? Is there a Christian "race?"
There's really no such thing as a race, a social construct that is used to divide us. It's really like a make and model of the body. It's primarily used to legitimize those who think they know what your purpose is more than you do.
It's completely irrelevant if Hitler was Jewish; but there is a good reason to evaluate that discussion, there's a lot of political manipulation going on right now. With people, either freely associated together or believing ideological nonsense, to serve an agenda that supports hidden puppet masters. There's much more to focus on in the framework of the Parasites; Jews have only ever been a giant distraction.
The Jewish community is not a monolithic singular one; there are many types of Jews. Within the Jewish community, there has been for quite sometime, a unique Parasitic Culture or Cultural Complex.
The closest way to describe it is, Sabbatean / Frankists. I do have many articles in which I reference them. Generally, the regular Jews are setup as Patsies to take the social and political blame for all the criminal behavior of the real ones; they are what I call the Black Nobility. These are dynastic bloodlines that have had their hammerlock on social, political religious organizations for centuries and by extension, any and all forms of government, corporate trade activity and NGOs. These few individual families also control ALL organized crime; especially pedophile rings, drug and organ harvesting, and trafficking.
The following articles I post awhile ago on the Order of the Garter and the Dragon Court as well as the Corporate Globalist Syndicates describes and diagrams these things out, I think fairly accurately:
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/intergranular-corruption-and-how
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/corporate-chains-of-custody-illustrate
This next one was originally written by Frances Leader, which gives an execellent primer of exactly who the Black Nobility really are, in addition it includes some links to other researchers work on identifying precisely who these people are:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/black-nobility-101
Please check out her archive on the Black Nobility, it is very detailed:
https://francesleader.substack.com/archive?sort=top
---- Cheers
Intresting quote. Citation, please.
The Nazis were a Zionist creation... or Freemason creation... only possible explanation!
The Rabbi hole goes way deeper... The Transfer Agreement
Edwin Black The Transfer Agreement
Note: Edwin Black is Jewish.
See how hard it was for him to talk about the Zionists and their Collaboration with the Nazis?
Truth Hurts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIdo-DYAhIs