Severing our Political Ties, Ending the Social Contracts, involving US 'persons'
Individual Sovereignty and absolute Personal Autonomy is at the core of Self Reliance this is becoming ever more important to discuss; in an era when Governments commit Genocide.
This is a long post, for the best experience, please view in a standard browser.
Previous Article Titled: “Selection 2024,” ties in with this one
In the last post, I presented a list of some of the possible solutions to heal the country, after “Selection 2024.” To make it a healthier place for Individual Freedom, to therefore, make the Government follow the Enumerations, Reductions of scope of Legal and Private Interest. I realize the list was only theoretical and many of you, my readers provided some excellent conversation and additional suggestions as to what some of the solutions could be, we can agree there’s a lot of work to do.
If we consider America as a truly Independent country, we MUST stop all Foreign Entanglements; De-internationalize our Economic and Political Foreign Policies. This could be a step in dissolving the Western Empire, as it currently functions, this would not harm our Social and Personal ties between countries, it might even strengthen them.
Cutting Israel loose, so it can die a natural death, would be an excellent beginning. If we let the World seek it’s natural balance, there could be no more Wars. The Levant could likely become Peaceful, because Balance expresses itself as Peace.
I am mostly doubtful about whether or not Trump will ever try to do the things listed in the previous article; I am cautiously optimistic, maybe. The purpose of the list is to Summarize our own Clarity of vision for what we ‘want’ to be manifested.
This Government has shown a codified disrespect for Natural Rights
To get anywhere close to how we think things should be, we could realize that:
The ONLY true Founding Document is The Declaration of Independence.
Social Contracts are pure nonsense; Expectations placed on Individuals, are an exalted form of Legal Deceit. Compelling Cooperation is oxymoronic.
Sovereignty is a Natural Property of ALL Individuals and of all living Beings, without exceptions!
Sovereignty rests Wholly and Absolutely with Individuals, who through their Voluntary, revocable Consent may “lend” benefits of this to Systems of Lawful Process.
Both parties to a Contract must be completely Conscious of and Consent to It.
Silence cannot ever be Consent; it is never Implied, yet that is how Law works.
Lawfulness is a Process of Agreements between Individual Sovereigns, respecting Natural Rights.
Laws that are founded on Lawfulness must be equal to simple Agreements, with mutual Trust and Respect. There cannot be a Crime without a Victim. Period.
Statutory Law and The Legal System have become codified theft; designed as a tool to plunder Freedom and Individual Autonomy. This must be Reversed.
Registration is Identity Theft; Conscription is Enslavement to service; Taxation is Confiscation of Value and Labor; Citizenship is reduction / denial of Sovereignty.
Of course, I merely wanted to highlight a few things. To summarize; we as Individuals, would find a significant benefit in getting Government out of our lives as much as possible. There are many dimensions to this; found in every facet to the concept of Self Reliance and Individual Independence.
I take an intense stance of Independence; every Individual is Sovereign, that means true supremacy belongs to, and resides in, each Individual OVER the State. The only thing that makes the power of the State even a remote possibility is Voluntary Cooperation and NOT Compulsion. In order to revolutionize the structure of things, it is necessary to See clearly what it is we can create in place of the current system.
Ending ‘Social Contracts’ and Nullifying Seated Laws — Reasserting your Sovereignty
Proviso:
Please do NOT take any content of this article as Legal Advice; it’s meant for discussion only.
Each Individual will likely get something unique from this topic.
There are many facets to this research, so it was necessary to overlap some of those facets.
This Article Intentionally Excludes references to the Fiction and Oxymoron called ‘Sovereign Citizen.’
A Declaration of Separation makes an excellent Case for a Parallel Social, Political and Economic Structure — Yes it IS Possible
Below is a very well written Declaration of Separation and should be read by anyone who wants to clarify what it means to be an Independent Individual Sovereign. Originally posted by Joel Walbert https://substack.com/@thetruthaddict? If you have not already seen some of Joel’s excellent posts, please check him out.
I hope everyone can get something meaningful from the Declaration below:
A Declaration of Separation
by Max Hillebrand — (as posted by Joel Walbert)
To The Governments & People of Earth:
We claim the right to exist, and we will defend it. We do not seek to overthrow anything. We do not seek to control anything. We merely wish to be left alone.
All we ever wanted was to live in peace with our friends and neighbors. For a long, long time we bore insults to our Freedom; we took blows, we did what we could to avoid injury and we worked through the system to get the offenses to stop. That has now changed.
We no longer see any benefit in working through the world’s systems. At some point, working within a system becomes cowardly and immoral; for us, that point has arrived.
Regardless of the parties in power, their governments have continued to restrict, restrain and punish us. We hereby reject them all. We hereby withdraw from them all.
We hold the ruling states of this world and all that appertains to them to be self-serving and opposed to humanity.
We now withdraw our obedience and reclaim the right to strike back when struck. We will not initiate force, but we do reserve the right to answer it.
We did not choose this; it was forced upon us.
To The Governments of Earth:
You are building cages for all that is human. In the name of protection, you have intruded into all areas of human life, far exceeding the reach of any Caesar. You claim ultimate control of our property and our decisions, of our travels and even our identities. You claim ownership of humanity far beyond the dreams of any Emperor of any previous era.
Understand clearly:
We reject your authority and we reject your legitimacy. We do not believe that you have any right to do the things you do. You have massive power, but no right to impose it upon us and no legitimacy. We have forsaken you. We are no longer your citizens or your subjects. Your systems are inherently anti-human, even if all their operators are not. We are not merely angry young people. We are fathers and mothers; aunts, uncles and grandparents; we are business owners and trusted employees; we are mechanics and engineers and farmers. We are nurses and accountants and students and executives.
We are on every continent
This is not a burst of outrage; this is a sober declaration that we no longer accept unearned suffering as our role in life.
For long decades we sat quietly, hoping that things would turn around. We took no actions; we suffered along with everyone else. But after having our limits pushed back again and again, we have given up on your systems. If our fellow inhabitants of this planet wish to accept your rule, they are free to do so.
We will not try to stop them. We, however, will no longer accept your constraints upon us.
From now on, when you hurt us, we will bite back. If you leave us alone we will leave you alone and you can continue to rule your subjects. We are happy to live quietly. But if you come after us, there will be consequences. You caused this because of your fetish for control and power. The chief men and women among you are pathologically driven to control everyone and everything that moves upon this planet. You have made yourselves the judge of every human activity. No god-king of the ancient world ever had the power that your systems do.
You have created a world where only the neutered are safe and where only outlaws are free.
To The People of Earth:
We seek nothing from you. We do not want to rule you and we do not want to control you.
All we wish is to live on earth in peace. As always, we will be helpful neighbors and generous acquaintances. We will remain honest business partners and trustworthy employees. We will continue to be loving parents and respectful children.
We will not, however, be sacrificial animals. We reject the idea that others have a right to our lives and our property. We will not demand anything from you, and we will no longer acquiesce to any demands laid upon us. We have left that game.
We reject all obligations to any person or organization beyond honesty, fair dealing and a respect for human life. [Lawful Path]
We will shortly explain what we believe, but we are not demanding that you agree with us. All we ask is that you do not try to stop us. Continue to play the game if you wish; we will not try to disrupt it. We have merely walked away from it.
We wish you peace.
To Those Who Will Condemn Us:
We will ignore you.
We welcome and seek the verdict of a just God, before whom we are willing to expose our innermost thoughts. Are you similarly willing? We would stand openly before all mankind if it were not suicidal. Perhaps some day we will have to accept slaughter for our crime of independence, but not yet.
Your criticism and your malice are much deeper than mere disagreements of strategy or philosophy. You do not oppose our philosophy, you oppose our existence. Our presence in the world means that your precious ideals are false. Some of you would rather kill us than face the loss of your ideologies, just as those like you have either hated or killed every sufficiently independent human.
You present yourselves to the world as compassionate, tolerant and enlightened, but we know that your smooth words are costumes. Oh yes, we know you, servant of the state; don't forget, we were raised with you. We played with you in the schoolyard, we sat next to you in the classroom. Some of us studied at the same elite universities. We watched as you had your first tastes of power. We were the boys and girls standing next to you. Some of us were your first victims. We are not fooled by your carefully crafted public image.
What We Believe
1: Many humans resent the responsibilities that are implied by consciousness. We accept those responsibilities and we embrace consciousness. Rather than letting things happen to us (avoiding consciousness), we accept consciousness and choose to act in our own interest. We do not seek the refuge of blaming others, neither do we take refuge in crowds. We are willing to act on our personal judgment, and we are willing to accept the consequences thereof.
2: We believe in negative rights for all: That all humans should be free to do whatever they wish, as long as they do not intrude upon others; that no man has a right to the life, liberty or property of another; that we oppose aggression, fraud and coercion.
3: We do not believe that our way of life, or any other, will make life perfect or trouble-free. We expect crime and disagreements and ugliness, and we are prepared to deal with them. We do not seek a strongman to step in and solve problems for us. We agree to see to them ourselves.
4: We believe in free and unhindered commerce. So long as exchanges are voluntary and honest, no other party has a right to intervene before, during or after.
5: We believe that all individuals should keep their agreements.
6: We believe that honestly obtained property is fully legitimate and absolute.
7: We believe that some humans are evil and that they must be faced and dealt with. We accept the fact that this is a difficult area of life.
8: We believe that humans can self-organize effectively. We expect them to cooperate. We reject impositions of hierarchy and organization.
9: We believe that all humans are to be held as equals in all matters regarding justice.
10: We believe that the more a man or woman cares about right and wrong, the more of a threat he or she is perceived to be by governments.
11: We believe that there are only two true classes of human beings: Those who wish to exercise power upon others either directly or through intermediaries and those who have no such desires.
12: Large organizations and centralization are inherently anti-human. They must rely upon rules rather than principles, treating humans within the organization as obedient tools.
Our Plans:
We are building our own society. We will supplement traditional tools with networking, cryptography, sound money, digital currency and anonymous messaging. Our society will not be centrally controlled. It will rely solely on voluntary arrangements.
We welcome others to join us. We are looking for people who are independent creators of value, people who act more than talk, and people who do the right thing because it is the right thing.
We will develop our own methods of dealing with injustice, built on the principles of negative rights, restitution, integrity and equal justice. We do not forbid anyone from having one foot in each realm - ours and the old realm - although we demand that they do no damage to our realm. We are fully opposed to any use of our realm to facilitate crime in the old realm, such as the hiding of criminal proceeds.
We expect to be loudly condemned, libeled and slandered by the authorities of the old regime. We expect them to defend their power and their image of legitimacy with all means available to them. We expect that many gullible and servile people will believe these lies, at least at first.
We will consider traps laid for us to be criminal offenses.
Any who wish to join us are encouraged to distribute this declaration, to act in furtherance of our new society, to voluntarily excel in virtues and to communicate and cooperate with other members of the new society.
Free, unashamed men (and women) cannot be ruled.
We are The Free and The Unashamed
Here is a link to Max Hillebrand’s site: njump.me/nevent1qqs8sql…
Social Contracts to be ‘Rejected for Cause’
In an era when Governments commit Genocide, while awarding themselves the absolute POWER to constrain, restrict, cull and set limits to Life itself; all who are awake, must stand. Dharma demands that of me. I lack other means, so I write this in hopes that it inspires, I know many people already are.
An Endless Train of Abuses by the State
There are so many levels of intransigence, corruption, fraud and force that has been brought to bear against us in the US alone, there is enough to write an entire library on it. All of this Abuse actually began in ancient times; however, in the US it actually began in true form with Shay’s and Whiskey Rebellions, put down by none other than our vaunted “First President,” George Washington himself. Many of you already know the details of this. It was done on behalf of the Bankers of the City of London, since the Revolution had to go borrow money for the War. Apparently, the former fighters of the Revolution were never recognized for their Sui Juris standings and were not allowed to hold their own properties in Allodium, even after having supposedly defeated the British.
This is a Democracy between Stakeholders:
The Western Empire is a Contractually Annexed network of Governments, managed by a Franchise Corporate system of Debt based Economics, where the Governments are the Public side and the Corporations are in the Private side.
Military Industrial Complex, is a tool for Banker Parasites to maintain Control, it is primarily operated by the US Government, acts as an enforcement arm for the UN, IMF and BIS.
Politicians are the public officers who answer to Trustees of Private Sureties, held by Private Equity Owners and Nobility; Politicians are rotating pawns, of rigged ‘Selections,’ they ultimately Represent the Owners — not us.
Medical Industrial Complex, it’s corruption is it’s Purpose, the use of toxic chemicals injected as ‘so called’ Medicine are designed to maintain sickness for a profit. Autism and other disorders are there to slow us down, so we cannot act effectively against the next train of abuses.
Currency is NOT Money; it is the ‘current’ that flows between ‘Banks,’ Money is actually the Equity of true Allodial Ownership, which is superior to any other authority. Those who hold Allodial Money are also termed as Stakeholders.
Genocide is the Straw that broke the Camel’s Back!
The “Legal System” has created many convoluted pretexts for how these Parasites fabricate Precedence and a Standing for being able to Dispose of people in whatever way they wish, because the Legal System effectively defines people as Property. It also defines Land as Property. Western Culture has become too comfortable with this idea. The Genocide in Gaza, done to Native Palestinians by a sub-culture of people who “Claim” a “Right” to “Take” a whole geographic location; Palestinian Land, away from them, is only one instance of so many throughout history, all done by the same culture of Parasites. They “Claim” Ownership through control and subversion through Contractual Annexation. These Parasites are the same ones who historically claim to be victims of oppression, have managed to do boatloads of oppression; they have completely defined the term “Holocaust,” by doing exactly that to the Palestinians. Because leveling hospitals full of the wounded, including women and children is “Israel’s ‘right’ to defend Itself.” — Isn’t that a burnt offering? It all must end.
We owe NO Allegiance to a system that supports, maintains, and provides international standing for these monsters. Israel doesn’t just control Israel’s Government, it controls the Federal Corporation of the US and others. That too must end.
“In a World where Death is the Hunter, there is no room for Hesitation!” — Don Juan (Carlos Castaneda)
On Suffering the Terror of the State:
The Declaration of Independence says a lot:
“All experience has shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.”
The Declaration of Independence illustrates the tendency of Human Nature where Men are predisposed to their sufferings where they are sufferable. Yet after that, points out that We created the system from which we suffer, and therefore We have the obligation to uphold our Primacy over what We created.
Whenever that which we have created becomes a hazard to Life, Freedom and Primacy of our Conscious Evolution; there are remedies that rest with us alone. ——(This can be thought of as similar to Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness)
Our Options
Repair or Restore: We can try to Repair a broken system, to correct it’s Disposition towards our Freedom. How we relate to it, how it relates to us. This may involve us being able to Reduce the system in scope, to fulfill it’s intended original charter, to serve and perform a function for us, as opposed to us serving and performing a function for it. This was the focus of my previous post. Some people believe Elections can repair things.
Severance: If Repair is not a option, yet the system persists in it’s Intransigence, Intergranular Corruption, Parasitism and Usurpation of our Natural Sovereign Rights, this impels us to Sever our Political Ties to this system. This step would be Nullification. A Parallel System can then be developed reflecting how we choose live. Self Reliance is at the core of a Decentralized way of Life. Anarchy-- Living with Rules, but without Rulers.
Dissolution of the System: If Severance and a Parallel System is ever challenged by the Original System, then the next step is Open Revolt. This may be the ultimate result of an unwillingness on the part of the former system to Recognize that true Sovereignty belongs to Independent Individuals, only. Conflict may be from an insistence on supremacy; attempting to maintain “Claim,” over Individuals. This natural Conflict is because it is the Aim of every living Being to seek Liberation and enjoy Natural Freedom.
Why the System is intolerant to Individual Sovereignty
A Declaration of Sovereignty merely marks the proper ‘points’ that establishes a Lawful Standing; not a “Legal” one, since the entire Legal System is founded in Fictions based on Fraud, written on Paper. The Legal System; out of it’s own self interest in maintaining “claim” over you, will never offer to acknowledge your De Jure status as Lawful Sovereign, who holds a standing called Sui Juris.
Put Simply:
The Legal System is an Economy of Control; You are it’s Collateral, Your Compliance is it’s Currency, Your willing Loyalty to It is it’s Coin, why would it ever allow acknowledgement of your Independence from it?
On reflection:
It’s really strange how a System once born from a Declaration of Independence, is now so adverse to that very same Independence as expressed by the free Inhabitants of the Land.
We are all born free and freedom is a natural property of a living human life, actually of all life. The True origin of Sovereignty is from the Spiritual Self. Sovereignty can be a Social, Political and Economic manner in which to describe manifested natural freedom; in this sense, it is an Individual who has no Ruler and has no Subjects. The system, the way it has been constructed, always wants to do everything it can to reduce this Sovereign individual perception, using deceit like the Supremacy Clause of State and other nonsense. If a clause for something must be written; then it is a Fiction, that needs protection from Truth.
Conformity
There will always be people who still want to go along with this Conscriptatory, Political and Economic Apartheid, these are the same ones who believe that “no individual” can be an absolute Sovereign; that this status can only belong to a ”State” or “Community,” at a minimum. These mouth breathers are the ones who keep mentioning the “Rule of Law,” yet they fail to question who ARE the actual “ ‘Rulers’ of the Law.”
Are these “Rulers” ever subject to their own edicts?
Are these Rulers none other than the Stakeholders?
Isn’t committing Genocide against the Law?
Will there ever be a point where the True and Actual Planners and Decision makers will face capital punishment for what they have been doing in Gaza? or Ukraine? How about the creators of the Plandemic? The Poison Jab? And all the False Flags too numerous to list? Individuals who control the Global Corporate Syndicates, who authored such things as The Patriot Act; EUA; Other Transaction Authority; The Prep Act and so many other Legal Schemes.
These Stakeholders or Equity Owners’ final destination should be to become lamp post decorations across North America.
Lawful Resistance and a Declaration of Intent
Finding yourself “Subject To” the “Legal Process,” must at some level have a remedy, that’s what Severing our Political Bonds is all about. Asserting your natural Freedom, taking back what is rightfully Yours. Individuals have Unlimited Rights and Freedom.
A good Declaration of Sovereignty would best take into consideration what the founders originally wrote into the Declaration of Independence. Because you are effecting your own Individual Declaration of Independence.
Link to The Declaration here: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Declaration-of-Independence/Text-of-the-Declaration-of-Independence
Grow Wizard wrote an absolutely excellent article recently about the difference between the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, many of the details he discusses, are ones easy to miss. Such as the essence in language that can hide meaning in plain sight, like the term: “of” and “for” as he points out about the title of the US Constitution:
Grow Wizard also writes:
“There were 56 signers of Declaration of Independence, many of them suffered loses, they died while fighting, or were captured……”
“How many people died signing the Constitution for the united States of America? None!!! Which document do YOU think is more important?”
“You see the Declaration of Independence gives us the authority to throw off a tyrant government. And tells us it’s our duty!!”
“That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it”…..
I would add:
The Declaration of Independence doesn’t just “give us” the authority to sever our political bonds; that has always belonged to us, what it does is establish both Precedence and Standing for doing so, by being crystal clear about what it means to be and act Autonomously. What is meant by “The People” is really intended to be in the context of the Individual. This power to choose to sever bonds or make new ones; does not belong solely to an undefined “group” that is called “The People,” whether numerically or collectively, it belongs to each individual separately and in it’s entirety, who in tern make up the body politic called: “The People.”
Courts would say Individuals lack Lawful Standing — Wrong!
Our Individual basis for “Standing” does not come from Government, yet the basis for Government to have ANY “Standing,” at all whatsoever — comes from us! — Period.
As I stated above: We created the System, therefore We have one obligation; to uphold our Primacy over what We created.
We are not just the creators of the System, We are who make the System function; therefore We hold priority over that system. Not the other way around.
A Deeper Standing:
Lawful Standing is rooted in your own sense of Spirituality; by identifying with your own Divine origin; each man or woman will find this aspect of Standing in different ways, depending on their background. The power to choose to sever bonds or make new ones is an immutable power of choice belonging exclusively to the Individual, and only by extension from “We the (Individual) People,” does it ever get to be exercised by a Government. The Declaration of Independence states that:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
All are Created Equal: — Yet Un-a-Lien-able Rights, such as not limited to; life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are experiences that can only ever be known or experienced in the context of an Individual. Groups, Peoples, Races, Ethnicities, Sexualities, Cultures, Communities and even Nations are all ultimately comprised of Individuals.
To create a fictional group called “We the People;” then pit that as “holder” of Unalienable Rights, against the Individual, who is the De Jure holder of those same Rights is a form Legal Deceit. This is the very basis of the current Legal Process, an Exalted Fraud.
I would add that there cannot EVER be a complete list of what those Un-a-Lien-able Rights are; reflected in Natural Freedom, those Natural Rights are NOT enumerated Liberties. Since those Unalienable Rights come from God, they take a much higher priority than “privileges and immunities,” granted by Government.
In the era preceding the 14th Amendment; God was considered to have a higher authority than any ‘man created’ Government. This concept is not just backed by Christian ideas of God, but also very ancient eastern Spiritual teachings as well.
A good ‘Declaration of Sovereignty’
When considering what to write, best practice would take into consideration how Law ‘would,’ or ‘may’ interpret your stance, there are many things that the so called Courts could say about it; likely, they would never ever agree with you on being essentially outside of their system. Best practice is never issue, submit, petition, or register your written ideas.
Remember theirs is a Conscriptatory System, ‘whereas’ their job is to maintain their Control over the Animals that live on the Tax Farm. With your full awareness of your Freedom, they can only ever rule an illusion. Their Power is made of Paper, they rely on You to believe in it and to be too fearful to reject it.
The important part of writing the concepts you hold on Freedom, is you can then pass that along within Family and Personal circles; this maintains the clarity of Vision at a Cultural level, with social media it can go public.
Another very important contribution from Joel Walbert:
You can't get out of the system by filing magic documents — The Quash
In this episode, I show people once and for all that the scams about filing certain documents and then being "exempt" from the govt are all just a scam. It doesn't work. Never will.
Link to podcast of The Quash: the-quash.captivate.fm/…
Lawful Standing — to Stand as an Equal
Your making an effort to write a Declaration is really only going to be useful to You, to ensure that you have recapitulated every aspect of what Your experience is; or must be, with Sovereignty. Establishing and maintaining a clear mind for exactly what this Declaration means to you personally is quite important even though as stated above, Courts would never accept it so don’t share it with them.
Courts are Irredeemably Corrupt
The Courts are irrelevant, they are designed to be Corporate Code Enforcement, they don’t work for You — at all. They will never Recognize any form of Sovereign Immunity, yet undocumented migrants seem to be getting immunity from the laws. Also, it is of course always best to live in a manner that completely avoids ever needing to rely upon going to a court. Always avoid interacting with their system, it’s not your friend. They are there trick you; magic documents, like the ones mentioned by “The Quash”, are there to set a trap — don’t fall for it.
The System is Rigged from Top to Bottom
Using the Legal Statutory System to defeat it’s claim on you is not likely to work, at least from within the parameters of the statutes themselves. The rules were written by the system, for the system to win against You, the Individual. Does it make sense that using those same rules will ever work to defeat it? Why follow rules written by your enemy?
Is the System going to cry uncle, and say, “Oh alright, we won’t use any of our overwhelming physical force on you, because you just ‘proved’ that you are not in our system.” — Probably not.
Keep Your Own Receipts — Documents are Your Records, not Theirs
The act of filling out documents like Affidavits, Petitions, Appeals and even Writs or Edicts, for presentation to them, to get them to acknowledge your De Jure status, is an act of Validation, which adds credibility to their De Facto legal power. If they aren’t the Master, why would you ask their Permission? Don’t ask permission for what is rightly yours. Just be careful.
De Jure vs De Facto
De jure
Means "according to the law" or "officially". It refers to what is legally recognized, regardless of whether it exists in reality. For example, a De Jure leader has the legal right to authority.
*** [This AI definition is not indicating the difference between Common Law and Statutory Law: Common Law would be recognized as De Jure or Lawful, while Statutory would be recognized as De Facto or Legal]
De facto
Means "in fact" or "in effect". It refers to what happens in reality or in practice, even if it is not formally recognized. For example, a De Facto leader is someone who exerts authority without holding the legal right to do so.
*** [This definition fits the profile of how Admiralty Law / British Commercial Law has been set in to replace the position of Common Law / Law of the Land— Also, the De Facto Government is the Federal Corporation, not The Republic]
Admiralty Courts and the BAR:
Grow Wizard writes:
A question I’ve proposed lately is who really won the Revolutionary War? Our courts are now and have been controlled by the Crown of England through the BAR association and their Titles of Nobility. What does BAR stand for? British Accreditation Registry. Why isn’t it AAR, American Accreditation Registry??? Because the Crown of England won’t give up their control of America!!!
Admiralty Law as administered by Statutory Legal System is the De Facto authority, operated and enforced by the BAR, on behalf of the Titled Nobility and the Crown.
Admiralty Courts are De Facto.
Common Law Courts would be De Jure.
Name Stealing:
The Statutory System; the De Facto authority, from it’s point of view, sees your name sake as “property in due course.” As a Possession of the Master Trust; a Debtor, that cannot possess anything, including Lawful Standing.
The De Facto Claim on your Name is Fraudulent
You hold the true De Jure power behind your own Name; you belong to nobody, except yourself as Sui Juris!
As Stated previously: A Declaration of Sovereign Status for pointing that out to the powers that ‘want to be,’ gets mixed results at best, usually not positive in your favor, I repeat this because it’s important.
The Courts view ‘citizens’ as a Commercial Activity and therefore a possession, the Legal Process is also their possession, they don’t want to lose their possession. Since the De Facto statutory system is in itself, a Trustee within the Master Trust, they are being tasked by this Trust to act in a possessive manner, it’s a contractual obligation on them to serve the controlling interest of the Allodial Money; of their Owners. The Courts would never admit this connection to a Public / Private relationship.
In order to be successful in the goal to establish Standing, we gain a benefit from standing back far enough to get a complete view of the full architecture of how this system has been constructed and how it starts to be applied to us.
Complete Nullification of your Identity within the system, probably needs to start from the beginning, by first addressing your Birth Name and the Legal Trust formed by it from going through the Nana Consent Process. Which is all about Registration.
Registration at Birth:
Any Registration Process is designed for ceding your De Jure private law right for what it is you are registering for. In this case it would be a 14th Amendment “citizenship.” If Registration means to transfer the Title of Ownership to Authority, why would anyone do this with their Name? This is the origin of their fraudulent claim on you as a US person. By Registering your Name, they create a facsimile of your Identity, on paper in all capital letters. This is NOT a myth, more on that below.
Important Etymology for “Registration” as a word:
I discovered a write-up on this that is so serious that it really deserved an article dedicated to it. This is the source: https://steemit.com/etymology/@knownassam/register-what-does-it-mean
Courageous Lion posted on the above steemit.com article at my suggestion:
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD
Excerpt from above link on Registration:
As for it's origin, it is clear that anything that has to do with REG in particular directly refers to royalty.
So REGISTER-ing ‘anything,’ gets put in a book of record and is given back to the king (royalty).
Regis = to rule over + Ster = divine feminine (middle english, from old english - estre female agent)
So by this - the CROWN/GOVERNMENT owns everything Registered. When you Register something, the divine feminine energy is ruled over or usurped.Reg = move in a straight line, thus to rule + gist/gistry = a temporary conveyance of title to the crown.
The king came along and demanded the re gister all of their land and possessions to him for protection. This is founded in the Magna Carta and feudalism.This goes for everything - your car, your house, your licenses, even your kids or yourself.
If it's on the registry, the conveyance of title goes to the king.
Also on Registration:
Regis (genitive) comes from Rex meaning ruler; the afix ‘tration’ is indictive to transfer or trade for; also, etymology of — tration: -iKuttn. Embarrass. At first derived by every one from the notion of barring or stopping the way; Provm barras, a bar ; Sc. barras, barrace. https://brittlebooks.library.illinois.edu/brittlebooks_open/Books2010-05/wedghe0001dicofe/wedghe0001dicofev00002/wedghe0001dicofev00002.pdf
The concept of ‘Lawful Standing’ from where I see it, must NOT be based off Law, or other Arbitrary concepts. Lawfulness is not the same as the Legality construct, we have all been conditioned to accept. What they do with your name is the definition of Piracy and is Unlawful from the very beginning. Just because a Pirate can hold something, doesn’t change the fact of ownership of what he’s holding.
Governments Leach Freedom from Everyone
With all the emphasis on Control, it’s puzzling how Government is always sold to the public as though it could create Wealth and Stability, is it really supposed to do that? Not really, there is an excellent meme that says it best:
“Governments create Wealth like Ticks create Blood.” (Complements to Heather B of Bliss and Blisters for posting it: https://blissandblisters.substack.com/p/pollapollooza/comments#comment-73131047 )
In order to Parasitize society, Government must turn people into Tax Farm Animals, or Legal fictions called “Persons” to extract Obedience, Labor and ultimately the Treasure and Honor held by each living Man or Woman. One of the main ways that Government operates is to convince people that they gain an advantage from “being a citizen,” but that is just an ear tag; yet it only attaches Obligations to Political status.
Liberty as Licensed Freedom
Western Governments all talk about Democracy and Liberty, but Liberty is only an enumeration of your own Natural Freedom. Like Licensure, which is the act of taking away a Right to do something, then selling it back to you as a Subscription, which must be renewed. You can only go so far, but no further. A dog at the end of a leash is said to have Liberty, a dog without a leash has Freedom. I know I have stated this before, but it is an excellent analogy.
Democracy, an Exalted Criminal Enterprise
Democracy is the definition of mob rule, you can only function within it if you have a membership in the mob. What we see today; as I often state, is a Democracy existing between Stakeholders only, while it excludes all of us. For us to euphemistically call it a Republic, is nonsense at this point. What is a Republic anyway?
Since at least 1871, the US has NOT been a real Republic; I am now certain that it has only been a Federal Corporate Franchise and it uses the Republic as a store front or facade to ameliorate everyone into thinking they are being Represented. The whole idea of there being anything at all that separates you from your De Jure standing by creating a mental firewall like Representation, is just a form of re-conveyance for that supposed Representation.
Representation
If you believe you have Representation, you are more likely being Ruled over by International Stakeholders, the Representatives are their Trustees. The US citizen is merely a subclass Beneficiary, whose ultimate disposition is a monetary asset and in that sense a Debtor; also considered an Indigenous Live Resource, (Livestock) that can be Plundered for gain by the Primary Criminal Parasites.
The Republic:
The topic of the Federalists and Anti Federalists in our history, deserves an article all of it’s own, because there are many interconnected details existing between the Central Banking Systems of the US and the type of Government architecture we are currently witnessing.
Citizenship as a Requirement
Participation in this system is based mostly on Conscription and Restriction, not Freedom. In order to do anything in the US, in an economic sense, you must necessarily be tied into the Taxation Authority.
You are restricted from owning something in a manner that excludes being taxed on it; this is because the construct of actual ownership has been split into different titles, through the Trust System of Law.
So, Debtors aren’t allowed true ownership; Beneficial Ownership is NOT true ownership, through property tax and other registrations, Beneficial Owners themselves are in fact a monetary asset as stated above.
The authority to tax is also a reason why there is another aspect of conscription; to provide services for various aspects of the system, at your expense. Basic examples of this could include The Draft into military service and Jury Summons to serve in an Admiralty Court; in addition, there is a presumption of the requirement to accept the US Federal Reserve Note as compensation for your labor rendered, or for your transactions with others. A prime motivation for Taxation is Usury. When the Economy is run exclusively on Debt, everyone involved with it are Debtors. Usury is how the Parasites leach out value from the Economic System.
The Federal Reserve Note
About The Federal Reserve Note (FRN); Courageous Lion posted an excellent Note on this topic: Federal Reserve Notes are not Federal
Courageous Lion’s main article: There Is A Reason "They" Don't Listen to Us
The Power to Tax is the Power to Destroy: By creating a regime of Confiscatory Taxation, under legal duress and threat of violence against anyone who is identified as a citizen, creates a subclass of Ipso Facto Guarantors for the National Debt. As Debtors, (as stated above) citizens are not actual owners of any assets, they are Registered and so are those assets.
The power to Conscript is the Power to Enslave: After refusing to render the service being demanded or to which you are summoned for, you are under threat of being imprisoned. Anyone who accepts this power in the hands of the few, has enslaved themselves to the Stupidity of Conformity. Resisting this is an obligation to Freedom.
On the issue of Stability:
Nothing is more destabilizing than there being an organization of force, whose sole purpose of existence is to diminish people’s value to each other, to constrain their personal choices, to confiscate what they create, seize their homes, including removing them from their lands and to even kill them over baseless excuses. After awhile, there is no more incentive to create anything of value because whatever it is, will always be taken from it’s creators without compensation.
Do you like Democracy yet?
Ethics of Sovereignty
This is written by Amaterasu Solar: https://substack.com/@amaterasusolar
If we seed our society with a code of conduct, calling to the fore the three Laws – which are:
Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of another.
Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone.
Do not willfully defraud another (which can only happen without fully informed consent).
Codes of basic conduct between people who generally recognize their own Sovereignty, will take into account that Natural Rights of each living human being, always exists in parallel to each other, never crossing each other.
For example, my right to exist never contradicts another man or woman’s right to exist. There are many ways to classify Freedoms, it’s always best to be dynamically aware that Freedom is in it’s best form without hard definitions.
A converse way to look at Rights: If whatever it is; depends on a Service to be provided to You, by Others, then it’s NOT a Right, it is someone else’s personal energy. In Nature, energy gets exchanged willingly and freely, but it is NOT taken, demanded, summoned or confiscated. Yes, I know there are Hunters and Prey, in nature; that’s not the same thing as Awareness of Rights.
Laws form the basis for Paper Terrorism
Here’s some Case Law in reference to “Citizenship:”
Whereas, it might be correctly said that there is no such thing as a Citizen of the United States….. A citizen of any one of the states of the union, is “held” to be and “called” a “citizen of the United States”, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing.
– Ex Parte Frank Knowles, 5 Cal. Rep 300
Whereas, a “citizen” “in the United States” is analogous to the term “subject” in common-law.
- State v. Manual 20 NC122, 14 CJS 4, pg 430
Whereas, in common usage, the term “person” does not include the sovereign, [and] statutes employing “the word” are normally construed to exclude it.
– Wilson v. Omaha Tribe, 442 US 653 667, 61 L Ed. 2d 153, 99 S. Ct. 2529
Whereas, a corporation is a "person" within meaning of equal protection and due process provisions of United States Constitution.
- Allen v. Pavach, Ind., 335 N.E.2d 219, 221; Borreca v. Fasi, D.C.Hawaii, 369 F.Supp. 906, 911.
Whereas, a corporation is not a citizen within the meaning of that provision of the Constitution, which declares that the citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens of the several States. Special privileges enjoyed by citizens in their own States are not secured in other States by this provision such as grants of corporate existence and powers. States may exclude a “foreign corporation” entirely or they may “exact such security” “for the performance of” “its contracts” “with their citizens” as, in their judgment, will best promote the public interest.
- Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall (U.S.) 168; 19 L.Ed 357 (1868)
Whereas, if a [state] citizen acquires the same legal status as those ‘protected’ by the [14th] Amendment, then said [state] citizen may be brought within the venue of the [14th] Amendment as a “statutory person”. By this means, [state] citizens birthrights become of no affect and their rights are reduced to the inferior character of “Statutory,” “Civil Rights.…” And if a white citizen has not “obtained the standing of” a former slave “by petitioning Congress” for admittance to venue and jurisdiction of the Fourteenth Amendment, then Congress has no power over that individual under this clause. [Note that Race does not apply, everyone is in fact EXEMPT from the 14th Amendment]
– Dyette v. Turner 439 P2d 266 @ 269, 20 U2d 403 [1968] The Non-Ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment by Judge A. H. Ellett, Utah Supreme Court
Whereas, a military venue, jurisdiction and authority are imposed upon the occupied populace under disguise of the ordinary “civil courts” and officers of the occupied district or region, Because the so-called “civil authorities” in an “occupied district” or “region”, “only act at the pleasure of” a “military authority”. It should also be noted here that the several State Legislatures, County Boards of Commissioners, and City Councils, are “constantly legislating to please the edicts of the federal government” and that their legislation, in this sense, is “not an exercise of State Sovereignty”, but instead, a “compliance with edicts of the military force which occupies the several states and consequently are edicts of Martial-Law rule”.
– Dyette v. Turner 439 P2d 266 @269, 20 U2d 403 [1968]
Whereas, the Supreme Court has warned: "Because of what appear to be Lawful commands on the surface, many Citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance."
(U.S. v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187)
Whereas, there is no such thing as power inherent Sovereignty in the government of the United States; in this country sovereignty resides in the people [and their posterity], and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution entrusted to it; All else is withheld.
- Julliard v Greenman
And...
Whereas, the people or the sovereigns are not bound by general words in statutes, restrictive of prerogative right, title, interest, unless expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind the King or the people. The people [and their posterity] have been ceded all the rights of the King, the former sovereign.
– People v. Herkimer, 4 Cowen (NY) 345, 348 (1825)
Whereas, history is clear that the first ten articles in amendment to the Constitution were “adopted” to secure certain [unenumerated] common law rights of “the people”, against the invasion by the Federal Government.
- Bell v Hood [“for ourselves and our posterity”]
Whereas, the governments are but trustees acting under authority and have no power to delegate what is not delegated to them.. but the people, as the ORIGINAL FOUNTAIN, might take away what they have delegated and entrusted to whom they please... the sovereignty in every state resides in the people of the state and they may alter and change their form of government at their own pleasure.
- Luther v Borden
Whereas, the term “Resident” and “Citizen” of the United States is distinguished from a citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen “created by Congress”.
– U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)
Whereas, the Congress shall have the Power to “dispose of” and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other "property" belonging to the “United States”.
– U.S Constitution, Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2
Whereas, the U.S. Citizen [D.C. special class] “residing” in one of the several states of the union, are classified as “property” and “franchises” of the federal (D.C.) government as an “individual entity”.
- Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S. Ct. 773
Are you ready to be a citizen yet?
I have posted the above in “comments” before, but it is worth reiterating. We are not citizens, that is a status equal to a "subject." Nobody could have offered “consent,” to be identified as ‘a citizen,’ precisely because the documents for it, are created at birth.
There are a lot of case Law interpretations, but it gets even more interesting when you check out the 14th Amendment. Please see further below.
Birth Certificates are a Trust Instrument
I have written a lot on the topic of Birth Certificates and Trusts, they are central to the Control and Ownership of People. In my opinion, they are in a state of misuse.
Please note: Birth Certificates are only a piece of paper, there’s really nothing inherently wrong with this, except just how your name becomes recorded, inventoried and identified as a subject of debt. A new born baby does not have any debt, so why does it need to be identified based on a preconceived notion of economic participation in a debt based system?
In my article: Corporate Chains of Custody Birth Certificates take a central role in how ownership is essentially split into various graduations of authority. This is also a very important article because it covers many facets of the system, the Power Hierarchy uses.
Here is a link to a good Trust diagram for the Birth Certificate Trust Register: https://slideplayer.com/slide/15219327/
Please note: BC Trusts do not have money in them. Don’t try to fill out any forms to go collect it, it’s a Legal Trap. Just like magic documents mentioned by the Quash. The Birth Certificate “Trust” to which I refer, only exists as a Surety / Bond asset in Private Equities, on the private side of monetary hypothication for value of currency, controlled by the Federal Reserve and Bank of International Settlements. If this were not the case, why would there be an SEC Form 10- section 12b that shows evidence for this?
Here is a sample of an SEC Form 10-section12b from the gov website:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1488240/000148824010000004/jawt_1012b.htm
Individual Surety Bonds, International Promissory Notes, International Bills of Exchange. (Excerpted from the form above)
The security consists of several bonds packaged together with one underwriting the other creating one packaged security. Each bond package will vary based on the obligation (debt) and will be packaged according to its structure. The bonds are The Affidavit of Individual Surety, Bid Bond, Performance Bond, Payment Bond, Release of Lien on Real Property Bond, Release of Personal Property from Escrow Bond, Consent to Surety Bond, the Birth Certificate Bond (Primary Bond), Social Insurance Card Bond (fractionalized from Birth Certificate Bond), international promissory notes, bills of exchange and any bonds not mentioned are not excluded for reasons of uncertainty of the obligation.
The Birth Certificate is the primary bond for its value is unlimited and it was created for the benefit of the United States of America where legal title will remain and equitable title stays with the company as collateral to JAMES A WILLIAMS TRUST and James Williams the individual surety to insure that the company pays their obligations (debt) to the public.
There’s a lot more information on this form, it’s worth taking a close look at it.
Does a contract have to be signed by both parties?
I certainly think so, I have been a Licensed Contractor for many years, in practical experience, you cannot enforce a contract that is written by and only signed by one party, the author of the contract.
Although a document must be signed by each party to be considered legally binding, the mere presence of signatures does not guarantee that an agreement is enforceable in court. To be considered a legally binding contract or document, three critical elements must also be present: Subject, Consideration, and Capacity.
Is the Birth Certificate a Contract?
In the case of the Cestue Que Vie Birth Certificate: Subject would be the name of the child; Consideration would be the “citizenship” and Capacity would likely be the value of the child (hypothicated on expected future tax revenue) If it were not a Contract, why would there be so much emphasis for it at birth? Why does it need to have any numbers on it, instead of just a Name, DOB and location? Why not let the Child, decide if he or she wants an SSN, or a US citizenship, once old enough?
Why not let it be an above-board question for the Mother and Father of the Child? It’s because Nana Consent tries to connect the Name of the Child to a new SSN; this is an inventory number for the IMF and Federal Reserve Inc.
Everything becomes clear; because by getting an SSN, the child can then be listed on the parent’s tax returns as a childcare deduction as a dependent. By setting this up, the Federal Corporation gets to keep inventory. There is a lot more detail to this, but the moving parts begin to make sense the closer you look.
The Government thinks that it owns your child, especially if it considers you as it’s Commercial Property. When a Calf is born on a Farm, the Farmer gets to count that as an addition to his Livestock inventory. The Tax Farm is no different.
Does a Contract under UCC need to have both parties consent? AI says:
No, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) doesn't require both parties to sign a written contract to be in agreement. However, both parties must be aware of the agreement and agree to be bound by it. The UCC also favors the formation of contracts, and will find a contract even if some terms are missing.
I found this quite interesting because of the contract law I am familiar with.
There are also some provisions in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC1-308) that actually could nullify the Cestue Que Vie Birth Certificate / US Citizenship / Nana Consent Process.
In order for there to be any true Lawful Contract; both parties to it MUST have actual knowledge of it first, and then have a willingness to consent, in order to make it Lawful. Lawful conditions are not the same as Legal contractual standings.
Citation see UCC1—308: https://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/2012/07/01/refusing-a-non-substantive-offer-nullify-commercial-law/
Excerpt of UCC1—308:
Anytime you see Law by itself as in the foregoing, it means the Common Law. Except that they are taking the common law jurisdiction from the contract the UCC. The remedy of course is UCC 1-308. So the UCC is a deceptive criminal contractual constitution of sorts to those who uses it against us.
UCC 1-308 is the remedy for any legal process under commercial law in the U.S.
UCC § 1-308: Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice,” “under protest,” or the like are sufficient.
Violations to Individual Identity to create a Valuation for others to Hold
Cestue Que Vie Birth Certificate / US Citizenship / Nana Consent Process is a Violation of Sovereignty; while facilitating the establishment of a subordinate status / class of “citizen,” out of an Individual as described under the 14th Amendment in the following ways:
Violations to Individual Rights of Sui Juris
Name Stealing: By converting John Doe, a living flesh and blood Man, into JOHN DOE, a corporate entity or Fiction at Law, whose name sake is imprisoned by Registry, also tied by numerical ID as possession of the IMF and Federal Reserve.
Lèse-maj·es·té: By converting John Doe’s lawful status of Sui Juris, Lawful Sovereign in Fact into; “a citizen of the US,” which is equal to a “subject” and as “a US person,” which is a possession of the Federal Corporation.
Enslavement: By converting John Doe, whose Natural Rights include absolute right to his own Treasure; into a Debtor, whose status is Ipso Facto Guarantor to the National Debt, who is also made subordinate to those who created that debt.
The Human Body does not admit of Valuation
Keys to Liberty link: https://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/2012/01/15/birth-certificate-tracking-its-movement/ This whole page has some very interesting information on it.
The human body does not admit of valuation {Corpus humanum non recipit æstimationem};
The body of a freeman does not admit of valuation (The Body Cannot be Liened or Levied, the Body is the Temple of the Soul, and Ultimately God’s Property.){Liberum corpus nullam recipit æstimationem};
Under the name of merchandise men are not included {Mercis appellatione homines non contineri; Dig. 50. 16. 207};
A sacred thing does not admit of valuation {Res sacra non recipit æstimationem; Dig. 1. 8. 9. 5}; ….
Could an Infant ever offer this Consent to be party to a Contract?
Was the Mother of the Infant ever actually Informed? --- Of course not.
What is the projected Monetary Value of the Infant’s Name?
For me, this entire regimen is exactly equal to fraud and fraud vitiates itself when it is revealed. As for consent; you could not have offered what you did not have.
Legal Process belongs only to the Federal Corporation
Since the Federal Corporation is just that, a corporation. It has no jurisdiction except with those that contract with it. Also see Congressional act of 1871 and USC Title 28, Part VI, chapter 176, sub chapter 176, subsection A, 3002 (15) “United States” means—(A) a Federal corporation;
Background:
The states illegally contracted with the federal corporation by passing the Uniform Commercial Code making themselves as well as the unsuspecting people subject to the Federal corporation and also to the states in their new commercial capacities. Therefore all of the laws (color of law) are contractual commercial laws and the remedy is UCC 1-308. The Uniform Commercial Code makes all crimes commercial only by contract as per 27 CFR 72.11. The problem is that you have to get into higher courts before they will recognize the remedy. The remedy however should legally and always be give without delay on demand or claim. This of course is the problem. The misdemeanor courts do not have a clue as to where their jurisdiction comes from and neither do magistrates. You have to get in front of a court with a real judge that tries felonies. The courts try to string you along under duress of threat hoping that you can be scared into a plea. But they in the end have to honor the remedy.
27 CFR 72.11
PART 72_DISPOSITION OF SEIZED PERSONAL PROPERTY–Table of Contents:
Subpart B_Definitions Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marijuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime.
Regarding the 14th Amendment — Last note:
The 14th amendment actually creates a lower class of “citizen of the United States” rather than the higher Citizenship of one of the several states of the union. The remedy provided to the 14th amendment, is an act by congress known as 15 United States Statute at Large, July 27, 1868, one day before the 14th Amendment took effect and also known as the “Expatriation Statute.”
This is your remedy to claim to be a natural Citizen of your state. This makes you a higher Citizen and no longer subject to the Article 4 loophole that also deprives you of your rights.
Please see further down for additional basic info on the “Expatriation Statute.”
The 14th Amendment and some Excellent Information on it from Bitter Root
Some of you already know about this comment from Bitter Root on another thread; however, because the information he explains ties into the topics of both “Citizenships and Trusts,” it offers a clear picture of how the Legal System was designed to capture and define live people, Men and Women as “US Persons.”
This is how the system keeps people under the so called Jurisdiction of the Statutory Legal Framework.
Bitter Root writes:
(Note: This is an excerpt, not the whole comment:)
Sui Juris has a Latin definition which means "of one's own right", it means that someone is "capable of owning property and enjoying private law rights." It is crucial to note there is no mention of "legal age" or "legal capacity" in the definition. That is because in the U.S. we have a post Civil War 14th Amendment. More on that in a moment.
Prior to the 14th Amendment a U.S.A. Citizen obtained their "Rights" from their Creator, i.e. God. This is set out in the 2nd paragraph of the Declaration of Independence which says in pertinent part:
"...all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights..."
Note the word "unalienable." It's root word is "lien" which is when someone else or some entity has a higher claim to what you say is yours, than you do.
Example: If you have a mortgage on "your" house, the bank or mortgage company has a "higher claim" to that house than your claim…..
Point to remember is that when your rights are "unalienable" (un-a-lien-able) they come from God and God is above all earthly governments.
The 14th Amendment, 1868, turned things upside down. It says in pertinent part:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State in which they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States,..." there is a lot to "unpack" in this 14th Amendment. Please follow closely:
1. We will start with the words "...the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States..." In Law where do "privileges and immunities" come from? They are what government can give "citizens". They are not the same as "rights" from God. Note the phrase at the beginning of that Amendment, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States..." Notice the coupling together of the concepts of "born" and "naturalized." This was the beginning of doing away with the idea of some people being "Freeborn Citizens" with God given rights and classifying all as "citizens" in the category of "naturalized", why? A naturalized citizen is someone born in a country that does not recognize "God given rights" but who wants to become an American. They go through the process of "naturalization" and once that is completed, they receive "privileges and immunities" granted by government, not rights from God! What government has given, government can take away!
2. Notice the word "citizens" in the 14th Amendment. It is spelled with a lower case "c". Yet, for example in the Constitution; Article II, Section 5 the same word is spelled "Citizen" with an upper case "C" and that word is not the first word in a sentence! "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution..."
In Law, even the capitalization of a word has meaning! Prior to the 14th Amendment, the capitalization of "Citizen" meant a human being who's rights came from God not from government.
Notice that there were 2 classes of "Citizens" before the Adoption of the Constitution! Those born here and those who had become Citizens prior to the Adoption of the Constitution! That is prior to there being a government that could "naturalize" those not born here!
3. Post Civil War, there was "The Act of February 21, 1871" which, among other things changed one letter of one word in the Declaration of Independence. It changed an "u" to an "i" changing the word "unalienable" (un-a-lien-able) to "inalienable" pronounced, "in-alien-able" root word "alien" (which interestingly enough the first 4 letters of that word tell you this word is "a lie"!)
So when this Act changed the word in the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence from "unalienable" (un-a-lien-able) to "inalienable" (in-alien-able) it supported the change in status of all Americans from God given Rights to government given rights!
Remember the definition of "Sui Juris" is "of one's own right" and "capable of owning property and enjoying private law rights."
If you are a 14th Amendment "citizen", (little "c" meaning you are a subject of government and a subject of God, aka "a Sovereign"), you have no "private law rights;" you have "government granted privileges and immunities."
Such as the "privilege" of being "taxed," ability to travel freely granted by private car only if you are "licensed," the privilege of being used in commerce via your "Birth Certificate," which is an "Admiralty Law Instrument." (Law of the Sea, therefore you have a "birth certificate" showing the "berth" where you came into existence used in International Commerce and much more.)………..
Bitter Root continues
In some 50 years of fighting the "good fight" I have only seen 2 individuals who were able to beat a trial in court because they had successfully removed themselves from being a 14th Amendment citizen and after nearly a year of attempts at tripping them up in a court room and after local newspaper articles of a "Couple Dumps Citizenship In Anti-government Rant" they were successful.
Now for a "silver lining." If you understand the "Restored Republic Idea", we should all be "restored" to Citizen status and the US Corporation ceasing to exist. Then, the use of this type of trust will, again, be taught, used and understood by all-even the Lawyers and Courts / Judges.
For more please see: Original article on Trusts — It’s All About Trusts … (Law)
Link to original Comment thread: https://badlands.substack.com/p/its-all-about-trust-law/comments
In Bitter Root’s last section, he points out that using their system to defeat their system is the least likely to have any success.
Additional Note on UCC1-308
Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights
In the excerpted information listed above on UCC1-308, I would still point out that while it may work in a small context, it is very difficult to Sue to Perfect your claim to full exemption from their system.
Also, keep in mind that it is a Conscriptatory, Penury and Penal System only designed to serve the Equity Owners and Administrators that operate it. These Parasites write all kinds of Law, but they only apply it to “The People,” who they view as their subjects.
The Expatriation Act as referenced above, from an AI overview:
The Expatriation Act of 1868 was a law passed by the 40th United States Congress that established the right of expatriation as a natural right of all people:
Declaration
The law declared that the right to renounce one's citizenship is a natural right, and that any government action that restricts this right is inconsistent with the fundamental principles of the government.
Protections
The law provided protections to foreign nationals who had given up their citizenship to become US citizens and were detained by their former governments.
Resumption
The law allowed US citizens who had lost or renounced their citizenship to regain it by resuming permanent residence in the US and declaring their intent to do so in a US court.
This is a known remedy, especially if you are an Expat. These days, the Federal Corporation and it’s Collection Agency the IRS, seek to force you to report your income, even if you live overseas and make all your money in another currency. There are many other countries to live in, that don’t do this. Now in order to use the The Expatriation Act, The IRS may try to get you pay an “Exit Tax.”
You don’t belong to them; do not comply, you can assert your Sovereignty, you are Exempt from them. Their Claims on you are baseless.
Additional Thoughts on the Importance of Sovereignty and Independence
After having read most of this article on Severing our Political Bonds, some may think I’m being too negative about Society, Community, Nations and Economics. My approach in all this is based on most people already having an awareness of the secret manipulations, a willingness to figure out the best way to Sever ourselves from Obligations, while being able to live in Peace at the System’s periphery.
Society and Community does not need to be negative towards Individual Freedom, but it will often reflect what the state of Consciousness is of the People who’ve created the System. All the little details that we now know, provide an opportunity to rebuild, or create a new parallel Society that completely reflects what we would like to manifest in practice. There are many positive examples that can be made.
Even though, I do take great umbrage to the presence of a Federal Corporation which acts as a Franchise / De Facto controlling legal authority for the Bank of International Settlements, IMF, UN, IFC who have zero business here.
I am not intentionally being negative toward the Country called the united States of America, or ‘these States United;’ that’s a location, called ‘America’ having a community and cultural ideal of Equality of Rights and of Lawful Standing.
The Land is so much more than just a land mass contained by borders; Land extends beyond those borders, it extends far back in time, to our deeper experiences. Ideals we hold enshrined by a place isn’t just a place — it’s how we choose to Live.
Related Articles
Many of these articles are covering similar material, some of them have additional topics that connect back to the overall concept of Individual Sovereignty.
Some additional remarks:
This topic of Individual Sovereignty can be found as a thread running throughout History, all the things we ever accomplished in Civilization are effected by it. Current affects are in all areas of human interaction, from Spiritual, Personal, Linguistic, Legal, Economic and Political aspects.
The way Hierarchy perverted natural Anarchy was:
Spirituality became hijacked for benefit of Religion; Linguistics became hijacked for benefit of Law; Natural Community became hijacked for benefit of Nations.
[Anarchy does not mean Lawlessness; it means Living "with" Rules, but "without" Rulers. Chaos or Pandemonium are not a part of the definition.]
The logic and truth are irrelevant in today's woke libtard America.
Geouze are 2% of America, yet, control the government, the wealth, the media, the culture, the education, Hollywood,... Having this small group cry discrimination or hate against them is totally void of reality.