Individual Parasites and their Crime Families have relationships, this creates spheres of influence that are compartmentalized. Through Private Trusts, their decisions are anonymized.
"Censorship is a Populist Tool to help move the Political Pendulum:" Could be, but so far it is the tool of the DEM LEFT and Rino/Neo Con Warmonger Elite!
Slow down and take a good look at Icke. He, like Steven Greer, looks like a reptile stuffed into a human body. I suppose if we watched him long enough, we’d catch the telltale shape shifting eyes.
I just started reading this after following the link in Erik’s post, but had to stop and tell you this is great!! I am traveling w/o my laptop, but will definitely read all of it as soon as I return home! I read all of Will Zoll’s excellent posts last winter, connecting so many things historically and I am sure your posts will be the same! I’m excited to learn more! Thank you! God bless you.🙏
That's an good article. Just goes to show, there is no such thing as "Public Health." It's always been a scam. Your personal health has ZERO effect on someone else's. When public healthcare orders are issued, just think of that as an excuse to do whatever the Trustees of the government think is necessary to asset strip your family.
Germ theory is mostly incorrect, there are some things that can infect in person. The concept of germ theory should be taken in context with terrain theory. Your body already has many exosomes in it, the immune system reacting to toxic conditions can cause symptoms of colds and flu. That's not to say that people cannot get sick, but having any immune response should be seen as a good thing.
Make sure you disconnect from the internet and turn all devices off to prevent nefarious downloads that you might not want. Trust nobody --- especially the Government.
Fantastic research and summary, thank you. It is important to know who is pulling the strings as well as what they plan and maybe, why!
In terms of "who", one article I read delved way back in history and claimed "...the Egyptians were just earlier Phoenicians. ProtoPhoenicians. Just as we have seen that Persia was another name for Phoenicia, Egypt was also another name for Phoenicia. It was the same people all along, but after 1,200BC they got tired of hanging out in Egypt and burying themselves under rocks, and they got on their ships and moved out to conquer the world". Page 15
"You see, the problem was that Geoffrey of Monmouth had admitted in the 12th century that England
had been settled by people from Turkey a thousand years before the Romans came over".Page 27
"Once the Phoenicians sailed over, they became the rulers". Page 28
This would make our current ring masters as originally from the modern day Lebanon/Eastern Med area. I don't know how accurate the article is but then history can be manipulated just like the news.
Egypt went through a lot of Infiltration over the centuries by various "Peoples" some of these are a bit misconstrued. Some of the Macro Dynamics were lost to historians rewriting different accounts of events. They then added their own fictional Micro Dynamic to make it convincing.
I'll check out that link, there are differing opinions even between historians depending on if they are trying to stick to "Biblical" accounts or are at least attempting to read the written history in the Language.
To your point, there is significant evidence that the Welsh language has vowel and consonant pronunciation structure that mostly conforms to Ancient Egyptian transliteration. Not the language itself though, just the structural functionality.
As for the various outside influences: There were the Hyksos -- the Egyptians really hated them; there were Hittites; the "Sea Peoples" and supposedly the Judeans were "enslaved" by the ruler of Egypt. But a significant portion of this is not correct when you read what the Egyptians were writing.
As an important footnote that could be related, there are two points that offer food for thought: The Jewish tribes were never in Egypt.
Reason 1: At that time, 1200 BC to 3000 BC, it was not called "Egypt;" it's ancient name at that time would have been "Tau Wei" (two lands) or "Tau Mrei" (beloved land) this would have been concurrent to the events of the Bible. It was referred to as "Kuma3ht" after about the Middle Kingdom era. The name Egypt comes from Hau-cupt-ptah. Translates to: "Home to the house of Ptah." When an ancient Greek term was adapted to describe this name: -- it became "Aegyptos" --- this is in reference to just one medium sized village, Memphis.
Reason 2: The Jews (Judeans) are nothing if not meticulous record keepers, so why don't they ever mention the Pyramids of Tau Wei in their Torah or Tenach? I think they were force marched along the Red Sea, maybe by the "Sea People," encountering what is now Yemen. That's also where the term Pharaoh comes from, not Tau Wei. The term "Pharaoh" is much more consistent with Yemeni language, that was the term to describe the local chieftain in those days.
The kings of Tau Wei were called: "Neshua" in Ancient Egyptian. Sound familiar? doesn't that rhyme with something? --- Yeshua, thought to be the actual ancient name of Jesus. There is so much detail that often hides in plain sight. — "Neshu em Tau Wei" — King of two lands. Approx pronunciation and meaning.
Thank you for your detailed and fascinating reply. I bow down to your far greater knowledge. All I now know is that much of "history" is actually modern fiction.
Exactly, its fun to rediscover it though. Also, even other accounts of it helps provide clues to different aspects to the story. All individual's experiences of any event in history are subjective ones, they will each tell a slightly different version of events.
Most interesting. It is important to note, however, that the US constitution shows evidence of being the work of parasites and instead of liberating the masses was a huge link in the chain around our necks. It's pretty clear that it was designed from the start to ensure freedom for the moneyed classes only. Please note that 4/5 of the promulgators were money lenders.
This should come as little surprise because,
"The Constitution looked fairly good on paper, but it was not a popular document; people were suspicious of it, and suspicious of the enabling legislation that was being erected upon it. There was some ground for this. The Constitution had been laid down under unacceptable auspices; its history had been that of a coup d'état.
It had been drafted, in the first place, by men representing special economic interests. Four-fifths of them were public creditors, one-third were land speculators, and one-fifth represented interests in shipping, manufacturing, and merchandising. Most of them were lawyers. Not one of them represented the interest of production — Vilescit origine tali.
Albert Jay Nock, Liberty vs. the Constitution: The Early Struggle
Liberty vs. the Constitution: The Early Struggle | Mises Institute
I will take a close look at this; it's what I have always suspected, it seems that there were quite a few founders who had the designation: ESQR after their names, meaning Esquire of the King's Court. I will check to see if that may have been a requirement or a formal status, to be sure, I do tend to agree with what the Anti Federalist say about a host of issues regarding the Constitution.
It's in the next post, but the main thing to consider about the Constitution, is the meaning of the term "Constitutor" -- one who passes debt on to a third party. The Constitution is an instrument that passes on National Debt to the States. This obligation was not invoked until 1933 by FDR.
The main focus I was pointing to in regards to the Constitutional Republic was the overall perception of it being much more simple long ago, as compared to the Federal Corporation and the labyrinthine structure we have today. I guess everyone would need to be able to precise in the desire to "simplify" what we currently have, then impose prohibitions to any future expansion of "Government."
Thanks for that! I never thought to look up the etymology of the word, "constitution" and it's relationship to the word, "constitutor." Seems quite revealing to me. Consistent too.
I agree that things seem to have been much simpler years ago, but I'm opren to suggestions to the contrary.
Here's another of my favorites...
"As a matter of fact, it was never a "people's Constitution", as has been so frequently claimed in Fourth of July celebrations, at Presidential elections, and on other similar
occasions. They, the people, were never very much interested, either in the project itself or in the ratification of a form of national government. They did not particularly want anything of the sort and they did not like what came out of Philadelphia, but this distaste was not strong enough to overcome their natural lethargy, so only about five percent of the white male population voted as to whether the Constitution should be accepted or rejected. As it was, it only got by by the skin of its teeth and by some very clever management on the part of its proponents. The whole thing, in conception, formulation, and realization, was the work of a small group of enthusiastic young men of property and position, with wiser heads on their shoulders than their years would argue as rationally possible, though they were not wise enough to foresee the unimaginable — but inevitable."
-Ralph Adams Cram, Nemesis of Democracy - PDF - , The American Review, December 1936, pp. 129-141
“That the East India Company, obtained the monopoly of that trade by bribery, and corruption. That the power thus obtained, they have prostituted to extortion, and other the most cruel and horrid purposes, the Sun ever beheld. That by the wealth obtained by these means, they have poisoned the Constitution at home, into a system of corruption, which they are now endeavouring to extend to this country. “
HAMPDEN, The Alarm, Number I-V, NEW YORK, October
27th, 1773.
Speaking of the East India fascist mafia gang, take a look at their flag. Betsy Ross my tusch!!
Goeff, you are amazing, I'm going to keep this info and study it further.
The East India Company was at the center of the Opium trade, the spread of the Masonic Lodges too. That was a major tool of the British Empire's public facing commerce; the Secret Occulted, hidden face of the British Empire was centered in the City of London, where the real power was held. The East India Company was a Trustee to the British Empire --- Beneficiary was the Royals, Order of the Garter --- Trustors were the secret families that ran the City of London, the real owners of the Empire this always included the colonies and later the United States.
Another great history lesson you have assembled here, Nefatohep. I always learn so much valuable information from your posts that give me a clearer understanding of the history of the modern world. I have a question about the passage below in relation to the Great Red Dragon. Are you suggesting that the Chinese will or want to take over the world under the leadership of Breakspear? Or, will the Chinese be captured by the West? Would you please explain this bit in more detail for me please?
"The leader of the Han Dragon portion of the Black Nobility is not Chinese. Towards the top of the pyramid is Henry Breakspear, resident of Macau, China. The Papal Bloodline are not exclusive to Europe, sometimes they import themselves, with tentacles reaching into Asia and India. This region is very important to the coming agenda of the Illuminated bloodlines, with the ‘Great Red Dragon’ China, taking over the world. They must think the Chinese are easy slaves."
Henry Breakspear is definitely a member of the Black Nobility and as the structure suggests, he is a Globalist "Trustor" in a very complex Trust System arrangement. So in a sense, as the Red Dragon is an esoteric representation of the Chinese; however, Breakspear has his personal name nowhere in sight. The Trustee in this arrangement would be The Western organizations who coordinate the Global Policies, like Bilderberg Group. The Beneficiary would be considered the Chinese CCP; remember how their spokesman, Klaus Schwad of the WEF always talks up the "Chinese way?" He likes their "Obedience."
About Trust and why they are central to everything we see going on; this actually a post from American Hypnotist:
[My next post will be about this Trust Structure]
"A trustor, trustee, and beneficiary all have various rights and obligations within a trust structure (which can vary depending on the trust in question), and this is indeed the source of their power.
In a trust, legal title to certain property is vested with the trustee, whereas right of use (beneficial title) is vested with the beneficiary. This is why you can sue a beneficiary, but you will never be able to get the property out of his or her trust via a lawsuit precisely because he is NOT the trustee.
Trusts can be massive, or they can be small and simple.
And
A trustee wields great power BECAUSE he does what he does for someone else’s benefit—this is how the role of trustee stabilizes civilization itself.
JD Rockefeller supposedly once said that the key to power is to “own nothing, but control everything”—and this is exactly how trusts (and their predecessors by other names) work.
Indeed, he could have simply said that the key to power is to form trusts, and it would have meant essentially the same thing. Again, trusts allow property to be available for use by one party, while remaining under the ownership of another party."
The main focus to the change going on is the Trustors want to asset strip the United States. The evidence for that is everywhere, why else would they be bringing in so many people from every country on Earth?
In the end, Breakspear and the rest of the Roman Senator Families (Parasites) want to assert total ownership over the whole world; to do that they employ any and every country to do it.
That ultimately satisfies the original Papal Bulls.
Thank you for your detailed reply. I have more questions for you but I'll refrain from asking because I get the main objective of what the Parasites want to do. Just like they did in March of 2020 when the world world locked down for the first in recorded human history which was most likely ordered by the Black Nobility and was probably planned decades ago. So much wealth was transferred to the wealthiest during lockdowns and complete mind control was achieved through all the mandated testing activities and PPP requirements.
The past Plandemic was just a test. The next one in 2025 is going to be catastrophic. These Parasites are not even human as far as I'm concerned. I'm looking forward to reading your next post. Cheers
great work, thanks. DeVere is probably related to the De Beers family, although wiki says Cecil Rhodes started this diamond mining company. Do you know much about the Payseur family? Would be interesting to know more about them. Interesting that 'Breakspeare' is the only non-Italian sounding name in the 13 families. I've heard these names cited by Santos Bonacci and others. Colonna sounds like it's related to Colon, Collins family, Lin-coln, Columbus, Cologne Germany, etc.
You picked up on an important detail, yes Breakspear is more unique although I suspect that the other families were of a different name sake at the time of Rome. Rothschild was once Bauer, but before that during Rome they were the Bakaroks; probably came from Khazaria at the time..... going that far back is always difficult to accurate.
I can't completely verify, these are names from archaic languages as well, from places that no longer exist. I'll see if I can dig up more details on it.
I don't know how you do it, Nefahotep. This is years of work distilled into diagrams. I feel like I'm getting it a little bit more with each article. But I need a Sabbatean sabbatical so I can read all of yours, Frances, Will. And try to put something coherent out on it, from 3000 ft. But all three of you have jam-packed so much in, I can't imagine how I'd summarize anything. Whew! Thanks for this.
I was thinking while in the hot tub that these are overgrown bratty children playing Halloween 24/7. I think ridicule is called for. If it gives them supernatural powers, prove it. But don't make someone else do your dirty work.
You did a fine job of summarizing what to do about them, I think. At least that's my approach, If ya can't ignore them, mock 'em, I say. They are like overgrown, bratty kids, and they're the reason Juvenal wrote, "Saturum difficile non scribere" or "It's diffult to not write satire."
The big picture is obviously an endless loop and I no longer expect anyone to grow up..
"It’s hard not to write satire! For who’s so tolerant of Rome’s
Iniquities, so made of steel they can contain themselves…
Exactly, and those Sabbateans are really good at posing as something they are not. Once people really begin to realize this facet of the conflicts we see globally, it will become impossible for the them to keep doing what they are doing. The wars will be impossible for them, nobody will go along with them anymore.
Thanks Laura, I think you are probably the authority on who is on top, I made my assertion of Orsini based on other info and research, which may not be as accurate as we would prefer.
The most important part of knowing the enemy is knowing just exactly how they hold control; if we know the mechanisms they use, we can subvert them and preempt them.
The info on the Scythians comes from Firestarter's research on Ron Paul Forums. I think he may be the most accurate source on some of these ancient historic connections. I think it to be easier to find out the ancient history of the Black Nobility and the Dragon Bloodlines than to find out the current info and their status, but I think you have done that really well.
My diagrams are developmental, I am hoping others can help me form a more precise dataset so as to truly map out the Globalist Cabal and how they function. Your videos are extremely helpful, though it would be nice to get some textual or PDF documents to study. There's lots to do, let me know if there is anything that I can offer to help you. Feel free to download or print out any of my posts, if it will benefit.
You have done really well in introducing the Crime Families by breaking them up into different chapters and identifying which families are in charge of the various aspects of the Corporate Syndicate. I found another one you may want to look at, I think it focuses primarily on the High End of the Black Nobility:
I downloaded as much as I could of these and your videos too. I backed them up 6 different ways offline, because if the Internet is ever taken down or if there is a "purge" of info like this, people can still have access.
At the end of the day, what I think we need to have is a cross reference-able list of the names of the Individuals who are likely on Epstein's client list, as well on the list of families who were involved in the major planning of the world wars. I have a fairly precise list of the individuals who worked to put Hitler into office in Germany. The other list that I also have is family names of the early members of the Dragon Bloodline and Order of the Garter. It would be quite interesting to see if some of those names are found to be present on all the lists. We could take that a step further and see if the current aristocracy that runs the so called Western Governments are connected in the same way. On a spread sheet, there could be a way to clearly illustrate the relationships they each have.
Thanks, I'll check those links out. I think you are right about Egypt, it was infiltrated by some odd looking people with cone shaped heads; I came across a mural that describes them as "sages" or "teachers." When I get a chance, I'll do a posting dedicated to the early infiltrations.
"Censorship is a Populist Tool to help move the Political Pendulum:" Could be, but so far it is the tool of the DEM LEFT and Rino/Neo Con Warmonger Elite!
Anytime information is manipulated, it's to gain predictive programing. The Information Embargo has been going on for over 120 years at least.
Orsini
https://davidicke.com/2023/10/08/david-icke-whats-really-happening-in-israel/
Connecting the dots...
Slow down and take a good look at Icke. He, like Steven Greer, looks like a reptile stuffed into a human body. I suppose if we watched him long enough, we’d catch the telltale shape shifting eyes.
Sabbateans DID 10/8. no?
Yes----- the short answer is Mossad is Hamas in Gaza. The real controllers are located in Basel Switzerland and of course the City of London.
Nefahotep,
I just started reading this after following the link in Erik’s post, but had to stop and tell you this is great!! I am traveling w/o my laptop, but will definitely read all of it as soon as I return home! I read all of Will Zoll’s excellent posts last winter, connecting so many things historically and I am sure your posts will be the same! I’m excited to learn more! Thank you! God bless you.🙏
Always happy to help connect the dots.
THIS IS IT...
https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-kary-mullis-nobel-prize-winning-inventor-of-pcr-test-died-in-august-2019
That's an good article. Just goes to show, there is no such thing as "Public Health." It's always been a scam. Your personal health has ZERO effect on someone else's. When public healthcare orders are issued, just think of that as an excuse to do whatever the Trustees of the government think is necessary to asset strip your family.
'...ZERO effect on someone else's". except of the family members, at least in my family.
Germ theory is mostly incorrect, there are some things that can infect in person. The concept of germ theory should be taken in context with terrain theory. Your body already has many exosomes in it, the immune system reacting to toxic conditions can cause symptoms of colds and flu. That's not to say that people cannot get sick, but having any immune response should be seen as a good thing.
Oh! Do you remember that some decades ago you did NOT want to talk about it?
Nevertheless, nowadays the "science" of virology is becoming obsolete...
You do like cats, right? https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/did-the-pfizer-vaccine-even-really?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=323914&post_id=137657912&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=1fi07j&utm_medium=email
The nationwide alert will take place around 2:20 pm EST according to this news video: https://trendingviews.com/videos/2540/whats-happening-on-october-4th/
Make sure you disconnect from the internet and turn all devices off to prevent nefarious downloads that you might not want. Trust nobody --- especially the Government.
Fantastic research and summary, thank you. It is important to know who is pulling the strings as well as what they plan and maybe, why!
In terms of "who", one article I read delved way back in history and claimed "...the Egyptians were just earlier Phoenicians. ProtoPhoenicians. Just as we have seen that Persia was another name for Phoenicia, Egypt was also another name for Phoenicia. It was the same people all along, but after 1,200BC they got tired of hanging out in Egypt and burying themselves under rocks, and they got on their ships and moved out to conquer the world". Page 15
"You see, the problem was that Geoffrey of Monmouth had admitted in the 12th century that England
had been settled by people from Turkey a thousand years before the Romans came over".Page 27
"Once the Phoenicians sailed over, they became the rulers". Page 28
http://mileswmathis.com/phoenper.pdf
This would make our current ring masters as originally from the modern day Lebanon/Eastern Med area. I don't know how accurate the article is but then history can be manipulated just like the news.
Egypt went through a lot of Infiltration over the centuries by various "Peoples" some of these are a bit misconstrued. Some of the Macro Dynamics were lost to historians rewriting different accounts of events. They then added their own fictional Micro Dynamic to make it convincing.
I'll check out that link, there are differing opinions even between historians depending on if they are trying to stick to "Biblical" accounts or are at least attempting to read the written history in the Language.
To your point, there is significant evidence that the Welsh language has vowel and consonant pronunciation structure that mostly conforms to Ancient Egyptian transliteration. Not the language itself though, just the structural functionality.
As for the various outside influences: There were the Hyksos -- the Egyptians really hated them; there were Hittites; the "Sea Peoples" and supposedly the Judeans were "enslaved" by the ruler of Egypt. But a significant portion of this is not correct when you read what the Egyptians were writing.
As an important footnote that could be related, there are two points that offer food for thought: The Jewish tribes were never in Egypt.
Reason 1: At that time, 1200 BC to 3000 BC, it was not called "Egypt;" it's ancient name at that time would have been "Tau Wei" (two lands) or "Tau Mrei" (beloved land) this would have been concurrent to the events of the Bible. It was referred to as "Kuma3ht" after about the Middle Kingdom era. The name Egypt comes from Hau-cupt-ptah. Translates to: "Home to the house of Ptah." When an ancient Greek term was adapted to describe this name: -- it became "Aegyptos" --- this is in reference to just one medium sized village, Memphis.
Reason 2: The Jews (Judeans) are nothing if not meticulous record keepers, so why don't they ever mention the Pyramids of Tau Wei in their Torah or Tenach? I think they were force marched along the Red Sea, maybe by the "Sea People," encountering what is now Yemen. That's also where the term Pharaoh comes from, not Tau Wei. The term "Pharaoh" is much more consistent with Yemeni language, that was the term to describe the local chieftain in those days.
The kings of Tau Wei were called: "Neshua" in Ancient Egyptian. Sound familiar? doesn't that rhyme with something? --- Yeshua, thought to be the actual ancient name of Jesus. There is so much detail that often hides in plain sight. — "Neshu em Tau Wei" — King of two lands. Approx pronunciation and meaning.
Thank you for your detailed and fascinating reply. I bow down to your far greater knowledge. All I now know is that much of "history" is actually modern fiction.
Exactly, its fun to rediscover it though. Also, even other accounts of it helps provide clues to different aspects to the story. All individual's experiences of any event in history are subjective ones, they will each tell a slightly different version of events.
Most interesting. It is important to note, however, that the US constitution shows evidence of being the work of parasites and instead of liberating the masses was a huge link in the chain around our necks. It's pretty clear that it was designed from the start to ensure freedom for the moneyed classes only. Please note that 4/5 of the promulgators were money lenders.
This should come as little surprise because,
"The Constitution looked fairly good on paper, but it was not a popular document; people were suspicious of it, and suspicious of the enabling legislation that was being erected upon it. There was some ground for this. The Constitution had been laid down under unacceptable auspices; its history had been that of a coup d'état.
It had been drafted, in the first place, by men representing special economic interests. Four-fifths of them were public creditors, one-third were land speculators, and one-fifth represented interests in shipping, manufacturing, and merchandising. Most of them were lawyers. Not one of them represented the interest of production — Vilescit origine tali.
Albert Jay Nock, Liberty vs. the Constitution: The Early Struggle
Liberty vs. the Constitution: The Early Struggle | Mises Institute
https://mises.org/library/liberty-vs-constitution-early-struggle
In other words, the anti-federalists were, for the most part, correct. Prescient, too.
Take a good look at George Washington and tell me his true nationality. Once upon a time you could find his real name, but it has been memory holed.
I will take a close look at this; it's what I have always suspected, it seems that there were quite a few founders who had the designation: ESQR after their names, meaning Esquire of the King's Court. I will check to see if that may have been a requirement or a formal status, to be sure, I do tend to agree with what the Anti Federalist say about a host of issues regarding the Constitution.
It's in the next post, but the main thing to consider about the Constitution, is the meaning of the term "Constitutor" -- one who passes debt on to a third party. The Constitution is an instrument that passes on National Debt to the States. This obligation was not invoked until 1933 by FDR.
The main focus I was pointing to in regards to the Constitutional Republic was the overall perception of it being much more simple long ago, as compared to the Federal Corporation and the labyrinthine structure we have today. I guess everyone would need to be able to precise in the desire to "simplify" what we currently have, then impose prohibitions to any future expansion of "Government."
Thanks for that! I never thought to look up the etymology of the word, "constitution" and it's relationship to the word, "constitutor." Seems quite revealing to me. Consistent too.
I agree that things seem to have been much simpler years ago, but I'm opren to suggestions to the contrary.
Here's another of my favorites...
"As a matter of fact, it was never a "people's Constitution", as has been so frequently claimed in Fourth of July celebrations, at Presidential elections, and on other similar
occasions. They, the people, were never very much interested, either in the project itself or in the ratification of a form of national government. They did not particularly want anything of the sort and they did not like what came out of Philadelphia, but this distaste was not strong enough to overcome their natural lethargy, so only about five percent of the white male population voted as to whether the Constitution should be accepted or rejected. As it was, it only got by by the skin of its teeth and by some very clever management on the part of its proponents. The whole thing, in conception, formulation, and realization, was the work of a small group of enthusiastic young men of property and position, with wiser heads on their shoulders than their years would argue as rationally possible, though they were not wise enough to foresee the unimaginable — but inevitable."
-Ralph Adams Cram, Nemesis of Democracy - PDF - , The American Review, December 1936, pp. 129-141
www.unz.org/Pub/AmericanRev-1936dec-00129
And this, (Key words, "East India Company.")
“That the East India Company, obtained the monopoly of that trade by bribery, and corruption. That the power thus obtained, they have prostituted to extortion, and other the most cruel and horrid purposes, the Sun ever beheld. That by the wealth obtained by these means, they have poisoned the Constitution at home, into a system of corruption, which they are now endeavouring to extend to this country. “
HAMPDEN, The Alarm, Number I-V, NEW YORK, October
27th, 1773.
Speaking of the East India fascist mafia gang, take a look at their flag. Betsy Ross my tusch!!
http://mileswmathis.com/EIC.pdf
I agree 100% ---
Goeff, you are amazing, I'm going to keep this info and study it further.
The East India Company was at the center of the Opium trade, the spread of the Masonic Lodges too. That was a major tool of the British Empire's public facing commerce; the Secret Occulted, hidden face of the British Empire was centered in the City of London, where the real power was held. The East India Company was a Trustee to the British Empire --- Beneficiary was the Royals, Order of the Garter --- Trustors were the secret families that ran the City of London, the real owners of the Empire this always included the colonies and later the United States.
Thanks, but what's truly amazing are the sources I've manged to stumble upon such as your substack and others.
Keep on keepin on, please!
Another great history lesson you have assembled here, Nefatohep. I always learn so much valuable information from your posts that give me a clearer understanding of the history of the modern world. I have a question about the passage below in relation to the Great Red Dragon. Are you suggesting that the Chinese will or want to take over the world under the leadership of Breakspear? Or, will the Chinese be captured by the West? Would you please explain this bit in more detail for me please?
"The leader of the Han Dragon portion of the Black Nobility is not Chinese. Towards the top of the pyramid is Henry Breakspear, resident of Macau, China. The Papal Bloodline are not exclusive to Europe, sometimes they import themselves, with tentacles reaching into Asia and India. This region is very important to the coming agenda of the Illuminated bloodlines, with the ‘Great Red Dragon’ China, taking over the world. They must think the Chinese are easy slaves."
Henry Breakspear is definitely a member of the Black Nobility and as the structure suggests, he is a Globalist "Trustor" in a very complex Trust System arrangement. So in a sense, as the Red Dragon is an esoteric representation of the Chinese; however, Breakspear has his personal name nowhere in sight. The Trustee in this arrangement would be The Western organizations who coordinate the Global Policies, like Bilderberg Group. The Beneficiary would be considered the Chinese CCP; remember how their spokesman, Klaus Schwad of the WEF always talks up the "Chinese way?" He likes their "Obedience."
About Trust and why they are central to everything we see going on; this actually a post from American Hypnotist:
[My next post will be about this Trust Structure]
"A trustor, trustee, and beneficiary all have various rights and obligations within a trust structure (which can vary depending on the trust in question), and this is indeed the source of their power.
In a trust, legal title to certain property is vested with the trustee, whereas right of use (beneficial title) is vested with the beneficiary. This is why you can sue a beneficiary, but you will never be able to get the property out of his or her trust via a lawsuit precisely because he is NOT the trustee.
Trusts can be massive, or they can be small and simple.
And
A trustee wields great power BECAUSE he does what he does for someone else’s benefit—this is how the role of trustee stabilizes civilization itself.
JD Rockefeller supposedly once said that the key to power is to “own nothing, but control everything”—and this is exactly how trusts (and their predecessors by other names) work.
Indeed, he could have simply said that the key to power is to form trusts, and it would have meant essentially the same thing. Again, trusts allow property to be available for use by one party, while remaining under the ownership of another party."
The main focus to the change going on is the Trustors want to asset strip the United States. The evidence for that is everywhere, why else would they be bringing in so many people from every country on Earth?
In the end, Breakspear and the rest of the Roman Senator Families (Parasites) want to assert total ownership over the whole world; to do that they employ any and every country to do it.
That ultimately satisfies the original Papal Bulls.
Thank you for your detailed reply. I have more questions for you but I'll refrain from asking because I get the main objective of what the Parasites want to do. Just like they did in March of 2020 when the world world locked down for the first in recorded human history which was most likely ordered by the Black Nobility and was probably planned decades ago. So much wealth was transferred to the wealthiest during lockdowns and complete mind control was achieved through all the mandated testing activities and PPP requirements.
The past Plandemic was just a test. The next one in 2025 is going to be catastrophic. These Parasites are not even human as far as I'm concerned. I'm looking forward to reading your next post. Cheers
great work, thanks. DeVere is probably related to the De Beers family, although wiki says Cecil Rhodes started this diamond mining company. Do you know much about the Payseur family? Would be interesting to know more about them. Interesting that 'Breakspeare' is the only non-Italian sounding name in the 13 families. I've heard these names cited by Santos Bonacci and others. Colonna sounds like it's related to Colon, Collins family, Lin-coln, Columbus, Cologne Germany, etc.
You picked up on an important detail, yes Breakspear is more unique although I suspect that the other families were of a different name sake at the time of Rome. Rothschild was once Bauer, but before that during Rome they were the Bakaroks; probably came from Khazaria at the time..... going that far back is always difficult to accurate.
Bakarok sounds like it's akin to Bacharach or Bach/Bock.
"Barock" also seems to fit.
As in Barack; that's a good one ---- probably some truth in there somewhere... Lol
I can't completely verify, these are names from archaic languages as well, from places that no longer exist. I'll see if I can dig up more details on it.
OMG! This is EXTRAORDINARY, your analytical compilation I was waiting for years already. Back to the future.
I don't know how you do it, Nefahotep. This is years of work distilled into diagrams. I feel like I'm getting it a little bit more with each article. But I need a Sabbatean sabbatical so I can read all of yours, Frances, Will. And try to put something coherent out on it, from 3000 ft. But all three of you have jam-packed so much in, I can't imagine how I'd summarize anything. Whew! Thanks for this.
Advice on how to eat an Elephant: just one bite at a time.
I know it takes awhile, but the Elephant has taught me a lot.
Do we eat the thing raw or do we kill it first? ; )
Preferably cooked but not poached.
Could be almost the same as "Shaken but not Stirred."
One comment the size of an elephant hair. I subscribed to your podcast but it's not embedded in this page, yet...
Pod cast?
ESL
I was thinking while in the hot tub that these are overgrown bratty children playing Halloween 24/7. I think ridicule is called for. If it gives them supernatural powers, prove it. But don't make someone else do your dirty work.
You did a fine job of summarizing what to do about them, I think. At least that's my approach, If ya can't ignore them, mock 'em, I say. They are like overgrown, bratty kids, and they're the reason Juvenal wrote, "Saturum difficile non scribere" or "It's diffult to not write satire."
The big picture is obviously an endless loop and I no longer expect anyone to grow up..
"It’s hard not to write satire! For who’s so tolerant of Rome’s
Iniquities, so made of steel they can contain themselves…
-Juvenal, SatI:19-44 Why Choose Satire? (30-31)
https://web.ics.purdue.edu/~rauhn/Hist_416/hist420/JuvenalSatirespdf.pdf
Exactly, and those Sabbateans are really good at posing as something they are not. Once people really begin to realize this facet of the conflicts we see globally, it will become impossible for the them to keep doing what they are doing. The wars will be impossible for them, nobody will go along with them anymore.
Thanks Laura, I think you are probably the authority on who is on top, I made my assertion of Orsini based on other info and research, which may not be as accurate as we would prefer.
The most important part of knowing the enemy is knowing just exactly how they hold control; if we know the mechanisms they use, we can subvert them and preempt them.
The info on the Scythians comes from Firestarter's research on Ron Paul Forums. I think he may be the most accurate source on some of these ancient historic connections. I think it to be easier to find out the ancient history of the Black Nobility and the Dragon Bloodlines than to find out the current info and their status, but I think you have done that really well.
My diagrams are developmental, I am hoping others can help me form a more precise dataset so as to truly map out the Globalist Cabal and how they function. Your videos are extremely helpful, though it would be nice to get some textual or PDF documents to study. There's lots to do, let me know if there is anything that I can offer to help you. Feel free to download or print out any of my posts, if it will benefit.
You have done really well in introducing the Crime Families by breaking them up into different chapters and identifying which families are in charge of the various aspects of the Corporate Syndicate. I found another one you may want to look at, I think it focuses primarily on the High End of the Black Nobility:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338079143_BLACK_NOBILITY_TERROR_A_PRODUCTION_OF_REMA_MARKETING_AND_WWW_OLIGARCH_ELITISM_Part_1
This is in PDF already.
I downloaded as much as I could of these and your videos too. I backed them up 6 different ways offline, because if the Internet is ever taken down or if there is a "purge" of info like this, people can still have access.
At the end of the day, what I think we need to have is a cross reference-able list of the names of the Individuals who are likely on Epstein's client list, as well on the list of families who were involved in the major planning of the world wars. I have a fairly precise list of the individuals who worked to put Hitler into office in Germany. The other list that I also have is family names of the early members of the Dragon Bloodline and Order of the Garter. It would be quite interesting to see if some of those names are found to be present on all the lists. We could take that a step further and see if the current aristocracy that runs the so called Western Governments are connected in the same way. On a spread sheet, there could be a way to clearly illustrate the relationships they each have.
Thanks, I'll check those links out. I think you are right about Egypt, it was infiltrated by some odd looking people with cone shaped heads; I came across a mural that describes them as "sages" or "teachers." When I get a chance, I'll do a posting dedicated to the early infiltrations.