56 Comments
author

Some remarks I think are necessary in regards to the Comment Section:

Most commenters are very nice, the conversations are usually quite enjoyable. That is the general purpose for this space, for cordial conversations, further discussion of the topic that has been posted.

What happened the other day here was an unacceptable mess. One person who is fairly sensitive, took a comment of another the wrong way and then when I attempted to say a few things, intending on establishing a more unifying and peaceful approach, that "sensitive" individual choose to make me the persona non-grata. I may have over reacted towards this individual, but considering her very deliberate and intense desire to fight, use of ad hominem attacks and attempt to define my intentions, I found no other alternative except to ban this subscriber.

Fielding comments, answering questions or offering suggestions about how to relate specific details of an issue can become quite time consuming. If you wish to leave comments; please do so, there is no requirement that you must agree with my point of view, or whatever I say. However, if you leave a comment, please consider that any "Removals" of said "Comments," or "Requests" to do so, will damage the context of the conversations. Thank you in advance of future posts.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

All of your points, especially the one about "appearance based" identities is quite correct in my view as well.... The purpose of my interaction was actually to express that.

Not interested in fighting, especially over an "agreement."

This whole thing I am going to be posting is a long series on the historic document-able facts about what happened in a previous horrible, global conflict. This subject may make some people very upset, it may make some people feel vindicated in some ways, it may make some feel overwhelmed. Whatever the case, this subject was never studied properly in the school system, people have gone with "feelings" and "beliefs." At a minimum, this re study of our history should be done forthwith especially in due course of what we are now observing in Gaza. My ultimate goal in these discussions to bring as much detail as possible to the very front of our consciousness, to enable the best of actions to be taken.

"Peace" must always be the result of "Balance."

"Peace" can never exist as a result of being "Overcome."

Arguments win no prizes, just an uneasy feeling of further adversity.

Expand full comment

Hi Nef -

thanks for these 2 deep dives into Hitler's role as the Roman Empire Cartel's puppet.

I have a series of note on this point.

And for me it's personal - my father served in World War 2 and my grandfather in WW1.

And many of our Austraian boys died in Gallipoli which the British deliberately lost - mistakes were not made - it was because of an agreement with their Bolshevik agents in Russia to take all of Persia, which gave them the biggest oil bonaza in history.

Richard Poe covered this really well in one of his articles, and the first time I read it I realized the true evil and treachery of the British Zionist Empire, and the thought burns every time I think about it.

A famous Australia author, Bryce Courtney once told us at a literary function that WW1 dropped the average height of our Australian men from 6'2" pre-WW1 - which generations of freedom and good food and plenty of meat had helped to create a tall stout race of men, different to our British cousins - and the average height dropped post WW1 to an average of 5'7" - because they mass murdered some of our best men.

Anyway thanks for your excellent analysis.

This would make a great book.

You have enough material there.

Have you thought about it???

The point I made earlier about Hitler appearing to challenge the Rothschilds' doesn't dispute that he was an agent. In fact I would argue that the major. reason Hitler turned the economy around in 3 short years - was because he took control of the central bank and issued a form of currency that was both debt free and interest free - and in 3 years he put 2 million homeless people back into homes, and 7 million back into jobs. And in 1936 when they had the Olympics Germany's economy was BOOMING and it wsa the only one in the world in the middle of the Great Depression to be doing so. He was advised how to do that with the banking system because he was not a banker.

Just like Vladimir Lenin - a lawyer - published Imperialism-the Last Stage of Capitalism in 1916 - but when you read it, then you see it is a COMPLETE OUTLINE on how to use a central bank, and the banking system to SEIZE CONTROL of all means of production!!!!!!! I'd warrant that book was written for him, that he didn't write it.

Cheers

Ivan

Expand full comment
author
Jun 25·edited Jun 25Author

Central Banking is the Cloaked Tyranny of an Economic Usury mechanism that inserts itself between people, while they exchange value with each other, creating a form of economic apartheid. It's where all Governments access the monetary power to do everything they do, especially war. When this process of Fiscal Parasitism can be magnified to the Global Scale, it marshals the leverage they use to pursue the agenda of control.

Another aspect of the Control Matrix and global kill box we are in is "Managed Populism."

Hitler was a both a Puppet and a "Manager" for the German Populism on behalf of the Rothschilds. My post on Managed Populism:

https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/managed-populism-is-a-vector-for

Expand full comment

" The leader of the Zionist Congress Theodor Herzl wrote in his diary that Zionism is founded on Anti-Semitism:"

9I know your affliction and your poverty—though you are rich! And I am aware of the slander of those who falsely claim to be Jews, but are in fact a synagogue of Satan. Rev 2, 9

It might look isolated and selective but the alternative would be to post the whole BIBLE. So it is rather meant as a sign post so someone might consider it.

Expand full comment

" Additionally, as we have all seen so ripely expressed in the world of “Elections” that have “Consequences,” the truth is, they are and always have been “Selections.”"

Agreed - If "selection" means a certain faction of THE CULT has gotten their favourite candidate in the pole position and he was "elected"

Disagree - If this is meant to describe a MONOLITHIC BEHEMOTH putting up the "elected" candidate.

Expand full comment
author

They are and always have been Selections. By that I mean there has NEVER been Representative Government at least since 1871.

It's possible that at some point in the past, Elections were properly conducted and people did have Representation then.

If you believe in "Free and Fair Elections," you are not too far from pigs that fly and purple unicorns.

I don't think that posting scriptures about what is or not a Jew is going to have any benefit here. Especially on an older post.

If you feel really strongly about the Buy Bull, you can easily start your own substack; the beauty of substack is everyone can, if they choose get a free sub and have discussions about the Biblical entries.

I have been discovering just how turned inside out and upside down the story of both parts of the Buy Bull is.

The term "Jews" did not exist until around the 1800s.

The original name of the original tribes were sagasu (ancient Sumerian) and Habiru (ancient Egyptian) later Habiru became Hebrew. Then, Judeans and Judea, with a "J" sound eventually became Jew.

Expand full comment

Btw, I forgot to mention if I had the need to build an ivory tower I would have done so a long time ago. Not only is it very boring having to preach to the choir in order to reassure oneself and of kin about one's own narrative, but more importantly it leads to blindness.

Expand full comment
author

Interesting, you seem to think what I say as having a Narrative, but what you say doesn't?

Expand full comment
May 1·edited May 1

At least that's the first impression I had/have - which of course might be premature and incorrect. But trying to read my mind (what I might feel strongly about) doesn't leave according to my imagination much room for a different interpretation. Let alone the inside out/upside down rhetoric.

Expand full comment
author

I have studied the actual Ancient Languages that these "Scriptures" are based on. Notably the Admonitions of Ipuwer describes things in an profound manner, where the Bible takes them and turns everything around. The Habiru were not slaves, the King was trying to drive them out, not "Keep Them."

Just for the record; I can see we don't agree on many things, but I see where your rationale is on many of these topics and that's perfectly ok.

As I stated at the top of my thread, I make no requirement of others to agree with my stances. We each have a unique perspective, each of those perspectives are valuable. I do attempt to approach things from as much balance as I can, it's not easy. Equal Mindedness is a difficult discipline.

Unavoidably, every person's perception with be colored from that person's Milieu.

Expand full comment

" Notably the Admonitions of Ipuwer describes things in an profound manner, where the Bible takes them and turns everything around. The Habiru were not slaves, the King was trying to drive them out, not "Keep Them.""

Very very interesting ... at first sight very disturbing indeed and one would prefer not to look to closely into it. But I will .... any suggestions how to proceed?

Expand full comment

"Just for the record; I can see we don't agree on many things, ... " which for me has never been the purpose of ANY conversation, without for a long time being aware of it. I was always - as far as I can recall - interested in the view of the other as it provides - considering attentive listening - valuable information to stand corrected or being confirmed in one's own views - confirmation bias being the stepbrother of the latter.

As to rational - yes and no. Up to a certain point it is all linear sequential reasoning. And the more "horsepower" (let's call it intellect) the mind has the further it can go on this path without being able to be stopped, only reigned in by equally powerful minds, the result of which I would call THE BRAIN OF THE CULT. And here we are at a crucial point. One inevitably participates in THE CULT in one way or another as far as I can determine. As THE CULT is the mental superstructure based on which each individual mind operates on a daily basis. Let's call the mental superstructure THE SOFTWARE. And the unit of accounting how well THE SOFTWARE is executed is primarily FIAT CURRENCY. Once enough minds have been indoctrinated and brainwashed for long enough the ALMOST perfect mental prison has been built. And the even more astonishing aspect of all is it has been built by the inmates themselves, brick by brick. And not only that but the inmates are even calling it democracy, which leads us back to "the selection". Leaving that aside and focusing on the more important aspect of the programming of the inmates. They don't even notice the programming, apart from feeling some discomfort here and there about their daily routines/comfort ... as they have been deliberately led astray from GOD ALMIGHTY they are lost in the woods. And I don't say that lightly. It truly tears my heart apart on a daily basis. As it becomes clearer and clearer that for very few there is a way back from the precipice. What lies beyond that is anybody's guess.

I was going - at least this was my initial impression - to write something completely different. So much so for going "somewhere with something".

Expand full comment

I very much appreciate your counsel what I should do.

Nevertheless I am not so much convinced by someone stating simply facts - boasting about his facts library comingled with narrow minded narratives - without considering economics, psychology, man's traits of behaviour ... Which doesn't mean that I don't appreciate the facts themselves. But rather the story around it - which is how "the Jews" convince every gullible mind to do "their" bidding.

Hanging on to one's own narrative - good/bad - is the greatest disservice one can do oneself.

I am more than happy with the facts provided, though! As they help me to fill the blanks of the painting GOD ALMIGHTY is painting into REALITY - called understanding.

Expand full comment
author

I'm trying to figure out where you are going with the determination of the word: "Narrative." Since you think that I have a Narrative, that must be similar to following an Ideaology; which for me, it's not.

Truth is NOT the same as a REALITY. Each human being experiences their own separate Reality, this is because they are experiencing the Individuated Self through being in a physical body.

When you refer to GOD ALMIGHTY, are you referring to the classical imagery of the Buy Bull that says God is our Father in Heaven? Where is God? Where is Heaven? Aren't those found inside? Or is God supposed to be sitting on a golden throne, high up in the clouds, ruling "his" creation at a detached distance, like a grand, "king log?"

Using the word "understand" , you do realize the word comes from "to stand under," as in to stand under another's AUTHORITY. I have been purging words like that from my own vocabulary. "Comprehend" is better.

We obviously have many differences, that's ok though.

Expand full comment
May 2·edited May 2

" Truth is NOT the same as a REALITY."

I could not disagree more. Even though I can see where you are coming from with this notion. Which is only further proof how important THE TRUTH - meaning of words - is. REALITY is different from reality. Can you see/agree on that?

Expand full comment
May 1·edited May 2

Asking questions is the only way to find out. But the mere notion that "someone is going somewhere with something" is the very fallacy your comment is transmitting to decry later on in the comment.

I am not trying to go anywhere with anything. I am merely curious which leads to me asking questions - sometimes by making statements - which originate out of facts/observations. Which is the outward part of the process. And then there is the inward process. Which mainly consists of doing whatever I am doing in the spirit of SERVITUDE to GOD ALMIGHTY. Sometimes also asking concrete questions and stating concrete challenges I have no idea how to solve.

ANYONE referring to imagery in relation to GOD ALMIGHTY has inevitably stepped over to IDOLATRY. Explaining it beyond that I would commit blasphemy by trying to explain GOD ALMIGHTY. GOD ALMIGHTY is inexplicable - in the conventional linear sequential reasoning mind fashion - but HE IS UNDERSTANDABLE. And ANYONE trying to understand HIM outside HIS WORD is doomed - if anyone asks for my opinion.

There are aspects about GOD ALMIGHTY that are clear to me but I would never dare to explain them other than pointing towards GOD ALMIGHTY'S WORD as it is futile for man's mind - THE SERVANT - trying to explain THE MASTER. Exactly as your comment is illuminating - probably without you being aware of it - that each CHILD is an INDIVIDUAL with an INDIVIDUAL HEART, which is all that counts in regard to GOD ALMIGHTY. Each heart - the echo chamber for GOD ALMIGHTY'S WILL - experiences GOD ALMIGHTY from its individual standpoint. Like looking at a statue there are 360° x 360° x time/past experiences. And still there are overlaps in each and every HEART with other HEARTS. Whether being aknowledged or not. Which is why we need HIM AND THE HOLY SPIRIT to guide us based on a pure heart.

And it is even stated that there are man/woman being able to exist in such a pure state of heart without THE BIBLE. I believe it because I believe GOD ALMIGHTY'S WISDOM MIGHT GRACE AND PURPOSE, not because it is my personal experience.

Purging/avoiding words that one has realised don't represent THE TRUTH is according to my understanding the only way to THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE - THE WORD. Being sloppy with words leads nowhere but into DARKNESS, which is why EVERYONE should value an honest conversation and even honest admonishment.

Expand full comment

I have to commend you.

Not many people understand this what you wrote.

Before I didn't know what to make of your Blog... but now I am convinced that you (hopefully) are not a Freemason...

This post oozes class...

I am glad I met you her... I am so glad Substack exists and people like you Terese Celente Ratio Dr. John Margaret which I appreciate. because they are all honest beings with whom to communicate is a pleasure.

I feel we are building quite a community here.

Additionally to your writing:

I came across the Fact that Aleistar Crowley in his book Moonchild bragged about bringing in the USA on the side of the UK into WW1.

Which means he was a Rothschild Agent.

The sinking of the Lusitania.

https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/the-memory-of-war-ii-the-sinking

Expand full comment
author

The most important aspect of what I've been trying to do is, to give everyone a reflective view of all the things we can see happening now. On a personal level, the research of this history has been teaching me more in just the last 2 years than I ever learned in the last 40 years. It is very reassuring to see so many people who have been willing to take up study on these topics. When the majority of the world is fully aware of most of the details, the very architecture of centralized power will fall. It will be our primary duty to offer our best insight to help rebuild society in a decentralized manner that supports and encourages humanity and Individual Sovereignty.

Expand full comment

I dig that.

Something similar happened to me when I was researching my patent.

https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/suing-richard-branson-and-elon-musk

Not only did I learn more than I ever learned before in around the same timespan... I learned more than other people did in fields no one has ever been able to.

I am so ready for this card house to collapse... hang the culprits and create a better society without centralized power.

I layed out my plan here.

https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/the-future-according-to-fritz-freud

Basically with two things we can destroy their whole power structure.

A) Energy from Water

B) Free Education

The problem is not only to destroy the System but to provide something better to fill the void we create by destroying the power structure.

The system will collapse... It must collapse for them to bring in their NWO.

At which point we will be able to replace them.

Individual Rights

Energy from Water

End of Aviation

Interstellar Space Travel

This is my vision for the Future.

Expand full comment
author

I'm subscribing to your ss. You have some great ideas.

Expand full comment

Thanx... I did so tooo to yours.

Maybe we can pull something off...

Oil fuels the Military.

Water as energy is the future to eliminate their stranglehold.

Expand full comment
Dec 7, 2023Liked by Nefahotep

Believe Shamir personally was part of the group willing to fight and ally with the Nazi military. Revealed in 1983. First elected prime minister AFTER that.

Expand full comment
author

That's interesting and from the description offered by Firestarter: "His name was Yitzhak Yezernitsky, [originally] Yitzhak Shamir a short bulldog of an immigrant from the "Russian-Polish border." Four decades later, he became Israel’s Prime Minister under the name Yitzhak Shamir."

He may have had some ties to the Bolsheviks, or it almost seems that way. Unfortunately, I don't have too much else on him, other than the assassination of Bernadotte, (and British minister Lord Moyne in 1944).

Expand full comment
Dec 7, 2023Liked by Nefahotep

I tend to doubt his ties to the "Bolsheviks." Of course, those who consider all "Jews" as one and the same, or who feel Churchill was a "Bolshevik," might disagree. I'm aware of Trotsky's kid gloves handling by Wall Street; he was of the "elitist" segment. (And Stalin, erroneously called a "Jew" by many, had him assassinated. No, this not a defense of Stalin.) At any rate, I'd wager people like Shamir, Begin, etc. were not "commies."

From Lenni Brenner, "Zionism in the Age of the Dictators":

"The only way the Jews could have had any success in fighting for their rights in Eastern Europe was in alliance with the working-class movements which, in all these countries, saw anti-Semitism for what it was: an ideological razor in the hands of their own capitalist enemies. But although social revolution meant equality for the Jews as Jews, it also meant the expropriation of the Jewish middle class as capitalists. That was unacceptable to the local affiliates of the WZO, who were largely middle class in composition with virtually no working-class following. (My note: Shamir's father owned a leather factory, per Wikipedia). The world Zionist movement, always concerned for British ruling-class opinion, never pushed its local groupings in the direction of the left, although the radicals were the only mass force on the ground that was prepared to defend the Jews. Instead, the WZO leaders concluded that they lacked the strength to struggle simultaneously for Jewish rights in the Diaspora and build the new Zion” and by the 1920s they abandoned all pretence of action on behalf of Diaspora Jewry in situ, leaving their local affiliates – and the Jewish communities in these countries – to fend for themselves. (post-WW1 after various empires broken up)

*Western historians call the Bolshevik revolution the Russian Revolution, but

the Bolsheviks themselves regarded it as triggering a world-wide revolt. So also did

the capitalists of Britain, France and America, who saw the Communist success

galvanising the left wing of their own working classes. Like all social orders that

cannot admit the fact that the masses have justification to revolt, they sought to

explain the upheavals, to themselves as well as the people, in terms of a conspiracy

— of the Jews. On 8 February 1920, Winston Churchill, then the Secretary for War,

told readers of the

Illustrated Sunday Herald about 'Trotsky… [and]… his schemes

of a world-wide communistic state under Jewish domination'. However, Churchill

had his chosen Jewish opponents of Bolshevism—the Zionists. He wrote hotly of 'the

fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally, and Dr Weizmann in

particular,. 'Trotsky,' Churchill declared, was 'directly thwarted and hindered by

this new ideal… The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and

Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people.'24

The British strategy of using both anti-Semites and Zionists against 'Trotsky'

rested ultimately on Zionism's willingness to co-operate with Britain in spite of the

British involvement with the White Russian..."

Expand full comment
author

There are definitely a lot of complex tributaries of information especially from that time period.

The main thing that appears to be looming out of the fog, is there are many layers of "Loyalties" that were at work. So far, my sense is that the workings of War were a choreographed, planned and then managed effort by Individuals who had an agenda to tie every country together, through monetary policies.

Expand full comment
Dec 7, 2023Liked by Nefahotep

Overall, I have the same sense.

Expand full comment

• On The Accusation That Hitler Created Israel

https://www.bitchute.com/video/mYfMoNU1MOX7/

Expand full comment

I keep saying... If They're in the "news" They're part of the play. Brilliant piece!!! Indeed, the "elections" are a farce. Every controlmind on Our planet is a for-profit corporation and They indeed appoint Their officers.

Expand full comment

No not unknown. We know the relationship of Mussolini from the March on Rome where he is paid by the British. We know Stalin is not Stalin because the ones who knew the old Stalin were executed. The British Empire was not anticipating the cost of the War but survived by relying upon controlling the US.

Expand full comment
author

By the way, I DO thank you for returning rationality to this thread. This whole thing is going to be a bit of a Dosey.

Expand full comment

I am on my phone but at home I can locate better information and hope to get some links for the thread. I know I can get Mussolini. Stalin is maybe not in my link list.

Expand full comment
author

I would say you are 100% correct. For other reasons. The US and ALL western so called Democracies were always Franchises of the Corporate System devised through the principle of "No Annexations." This concept was discussed in the Learned Elders of Zion. The spoils of war were traditionally the land and therefore the home of the enemy. The system they replaced it with was to supplant the "Land" with the Contractual Legal System, which included Trusts.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Yes this is the idea of Iain McGilchrist as well in the Master and his Emissary. Left Hemisphere dominance is irrational. The Right Hemisphere is the brain that is engaged with reality. Curiously the Left Hemisphere ignores the Right as much as possible. The idea of the Corpus Collosum integrating both Hemispheres is wrong. It shuts down communication between the two. Our world is Left Hemisphere catastrophe from which we may not emerge.

Expand full comment

So was Mussolini and the body double called Stalin.

Expand full comment
author

Unknown. Everything needs research.

Expand full comment

I wonder how this findings can be brought to a common interpretive frame with Mathis:

http://ancient-spooks.de/meta-infos/introduction-miles-mathis.html

I'm not saying Mathis is right all the time, but he seems to have a point in most cases, and to me, it looks like Nefahotep's approach is compatible with his quite a bit.

Expand full comment
author

I'll check that out Ray, and thank you again for the great post you did on the topic of historic narratives.

"There seems to be an Avalanche that has begun, it is too late for the Pebbles to Vote." This is a little quotation that I've used to describe the unavoidable movement of our understanding. I won't call it a "Collective Zeitgeist," as most people know, I abhor "Collectivism," but to be fair, the overall social cognition is in a movement towards a much more clear "sight."

Expand full comment

Mathis is fun to read, but it takes time to go through his writings. He seems to employ the same cognitive strategy and follows the same cognitive process in his analyses, which has its own limitations, but what doesn't.

Recently, I've been noticing agents to start publishing insurmountable amounts of asinine information regarding WW2 (as well), but I refuse to respond to them.

Your initiative will likely profit from Mathis.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the brilliant history lesson, Nefatohep. I've added this one to my SS Saved list, like I do all your others. Looking forward to reading your next brilliant history lesson. 👏👏

Expand full comment

Iatrogenic NAZI camps in Europe, then, iatrogenic world wide medical systems, now; run by Jews for a change.

Expand full comment

Very impressive; and tons of links I didn't open yet.

Side comments - Polish People have been fighting for decades, pointing at commonly used phrase "Polish concentration camps" which, as you correctly stated, were NAZI camps, though on territory of Poland.

During WWII Jews who were living in Poland volunteered to occupy those camps and having just a suitcase knocked at the front doors to get in.

That was in transition to their goal, millennia old, to create the Greater Israel (currently they grab Palestine) and their final goal is to concur entire planet.

Expand full comment

Nefahotep makes it clear that the world wars were for the Global Elite, all the players are pawns on a chessboard, and all this has led to where we are today.

Expand full comment

This rabbit hole began for me with the British historian - David Irving. I had never heard anything about Nazi Germany, other than the official script up to that point. I was dumbstruck that people could go to prison and be fined for questioning the official narrative.

I did cursory research on it after that, but had always kept it on the back burner, tasting it now and then with bits of bread that I noticed along the path. As I began to read H. Ford’s The International J, I was puzzled by Ford’s appearance , because he looks quite Jewish to me (as does George Washington).

Fast forward until recently, as I read different articles about the Nazis and again, I was perplexed by the many Jewish sounding names (and coinciding appearances) of many of the top German military brass. There has long been the rumors of Hitler being half Jewish, but I never gave it much thought.

This led me to think about Adolph Eichmann, who again with the name and appearance, looks Jewish. I recently read somewhere, that in his trial transcripts he says that “he has family members and relatives that are Jewish”, which I interpret him saying as, “I am Jewish”. Then I saw photos of him with “the noose” around his neck very loosely, with a smile on his face - duping delight, probably.

We know so much of life has been a charade, especially since the advent of the camera. And that’s how I feel about the Holo-thing, that certainly some Jews were killed, but most of it was sleight of hand narrative building (for the long game). I think the Eichmann thing was a skit. I think that the power in Germany was predominantly Jewish and that they hatched the Holocaust narrative to push those wealthy Jews (? If they are actually Jews) out of Germany and into Palestine. I think they were just too comfortable to go willingly, and the Havarra Agreement was the carrot, and what happened later, was the stick for the holdouts.

Expand full comment
author

Tereza did a great post on David Irving. She really did an excellent job pointing out the areas where Narrative Control has been used to sell the public a nearly complete falsehood. The days where they think they can put someone into a cage for not believing a narrative are over.

The thing about the Jewish Community that rarely every gets mentioned in the main stream is the huge difference between the Ashkenazi Jewish and the other much more rare true Semitic Jews; there are a few of those left. The thing that the ADL likes to do is confuse people into believing that the Jews are all monolithic; as if the people at the top like the Warburgs the Hapsburgs and even the lower level ones like the Soros are the same as the average regular people who observe the Torah and just want to live regular lives. The people at the top are NOT Jews, they are Sabbatean / Frankists. They have their own very different psychology and psychopathy, with all the human trafficking and blood rituals.

Expand full comment
RemovedNov 19, 2023Liked by Nefahotep
Comment removed
Expand full comment
author

Sorry about that, here's a link:

https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/hot-and-cold-hatred

This is also a very excellent post of hers recently.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
RemovedNov 19, 2023Liked by Nefahotep
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
RemovedNov 19, 2023Liked by Nefahotep
Comment removed
Expand full comment
author

The most important key to seeing a person for who they are is to carefully observe what they do. People will not always believe what other people say of themselves, but they WILL believe what they observe in the form of actions.

As an Individualist, I insist on seeing each individual as unique and therefore Sovereign, as an extension of that, they have the executive power of choice as to what actions they may perform.

A Human Body comes in many different variations of design, I tend to think of the "Race" or Ethnic Identity as a way of saying: "Make and Model" of the body; says nothing of the driver of the vessel.

Also, in Hindu culture, Names hold a significant element of importance due to the meanings that can be found in them. The Spiritual Name of a person is a true Sovereign Identity, and is typically never shared with anyone unless they are of very close relationship.

The most powerful of all perceptions ever is truly "Nameless," because to be able to name someone or something, is to "Acquire it, from it's Nature."

These are very deep subjects, I will try to write something on this in a regular post to hopefully bring people together on this. This is a major root of the Criminal Cabal's method of manipulation we must take back our Identity from the "Name Stealers."

Expand full comment

So I see that I cannot edit my own comments and that all of Elizabeth’s comments are deleted. Without her comments, mine lose a lot of context. Please delete all mine too.

Expand full comment
RemovedNov 19, 2023Liked by Nefahotep
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment