People with Elongated Heads and their Origins, who were they? What caused this Cone shaped Physical Oddity?

Physiologically, Cone Headed people, whose remains are found world wide are genetically from one region; The Black Sea area of Ukraine and Caucasus. They migrated to America, nearly 2000 years ago.

This post is too long for email, please use a regular browser if you can.

Preface:

After a whole year on Sub Stack, this has been one of the more challenging post that I have done. This is a topic that is outside my usual area of focus. I am not a biologist, nor a professional paleontologist. I DO tend to endorse “alternative researchers” because they are the ones who question everything; in the process, they challenge scientific orthodoxy. Like most alternative researchers, I have a curiosity and willingness to question absolutely everything. Questioning is what Science does, creating “Narratives” is what Politics does.

Believe Nothing:

I am not a believer in one argument over another, I'm willing to appreciate all points of view, as my purpose in this is to present without prejudgements. Even though the arguments presented here, appear to be Alternative Research vs Academia, I do try to take a neutral position; believe nothing just observe. I am not directly against Academia, just hard on them for refusing to consider all the possibilities.

I have been kicking around the prospect of posting on this topic for awhile; after I have mulled it over, I have finally decided to go ahead. It’s just a discussion after all; I have no stake in it, yet the subject could help shed some light in places where science is too politically or financially fearful to go.

I am not making any “claims” as to who or what the Cone Heads really were; however, I will state my suspicions. Since doing the research on the Royal Bloodlines and Dragon Court, it’s become my intuitive sense that there are some connections. Some people like to use the term Nephilim, I try to avoid it because it’s too Biblical.

Primary points

• There are Paleontological Semi-Human remains found in Crimea and Peru that are known commonly as Elongated Skulls. They are also found in other locations.

• Elongated Skulls; as remains of ancient people, seem to diverge into two groups:

• Group One are people who practiced “Artificial Cranial Deformation,” this is Academia’s excuse not to investigate anything; a justification for not following the scientific method. “Nothing to see here….. move along.”

• Group Two are the remains of people more ancient than Group One; these people had a “Natural Elongation” feature to their heads. There are GOOD reasons why I say they are “Naturally Elongated.” They are the reason for this post.

• Those with Natural Elongation have Physiological characteristics accompanied by these features that can’t be explained by Artificial Cranial Deformation. Please see list of “differences” half way down.

• Genetic testing was done to determine what exactly were the differences between the Naturally Elongated vs Cranially Deformed copy cats. The Haplogroup connection tells a lot about where these people originated.

• Alternative researcher Brian Foerster, has many videos online that partially disprove “Academia’s” assertion of cranial deformation; there are a few of these videos below, first one is fairly short.

• I have suspected these “Cone Headed” people to have some kind of connection to the Dragon Bloodline, Royal Scyths and possibly the Hapiru who appear to become marauders in Canaan, (Ancient Palestine) sometime around 4,000 years ago. The Ancient Egyptians have a record of the Hyksos invasion. Also, please see the Egyptian mural, midway down the page.

• I do NOT endorse comparing Cone Headed physiology with that of “Extraterrestrials.” Yet the Elongated Skulls DO yield evidence of DNA never before seen in any Hominid, though it may be DNA contamination, according to some. This may also indicate a different Species of our genus, which points to a “Hybridization” or “Mutation” event in our prehistory.

• IMPORTANTLY: This Hybridization is NOT connected to Rh negative blood. Rh factor was around WAY before the Cone Heads.

Can Physiology have an influence on Psychology?

If someone is really tall, approx 7.5 to 8 ft, has a larger head with bright red hair; yes, I think their physical appearance could have an effect on how regular people would treat that person, socially. Psychologically, this could result in him developing a superiority complex. Just imagine if there were a small population of people like this, I’m sure they would never take advantage of being treated like they were gods, right?

Can a Factor of ‘Physical Difference’ build the basis for Psychopathy?

If someone were to develop a superiority complex; reinforced both socially and superstitiously, thinking of themselves as ‘higher’ or more ‘important’ than average smaller people, this could easily metastasize into an abusive Psychopathy. Would that be entirely ‘that’ person’s fault? Or would that be partially the result of average people looking up to him? This could be the birth of Arbitrary Hierarchy, “Consent” is the mother to Tyranny, necessity is the Tyrant’s plea.

The Physiology of Dragons and their ‘potential’ ancestors, The Cone Heads: (what it could mean and why)

As part of studying the Globalist Enemy; it makes sense to discuss their possible Physiology, because that may be their sense of “Why” they have built a culture based on them being Superior to the rest of Humanity. There are a few points that can be drawn from Dragon Court that expresses their preoccupation for seeking “Masterhood.”

One aspect brought forward, tied to Physiology, was their intense desire to “maintain blood purity,” as indicated by Nickolas De Vere. Please see Dragon Court part 5. They have continuously intermarried, to maintain their supposed ”Divine Right to Rule,” this was also for control and concentration of their “Wealth.”

Why does a ”Divine Right to Rule,” come from a Bloodline at all? It’s a Physiological trait

The ‘Divine’ is NOT directly attributed to physical appearances or traits

In my last post, I brought a discussion about Rh negative blood, or Rhesus factor as a potential way to “tease out” certain aspects of our human prehistory and how it may have some bearing on what we see today. This Rh factor discussion should NOT in anyway be presumed to connect all people having Rh negative factor to the Parasitic Criminal Bloodline. Also, just like the Rh factor, the phenomenon known as Elongated Heads or Cone Heads, should NOT necessarily be insinuated as directly connected to the Parasitic Criminal Bloodline nor Extraterrestrials in spite of my suspicions. Please take pieces of evidence individually, there may be a connection or there may not be. For reference previous post linked below:

Rh- Negative Blood and Antediluvian Civilizations, a possible connection the Beginnings of Royal Bloodlines

The Rh factor seems to have existed in Human populations for approx 30,000 years; the Cone Head Feature seems to just “show up” some time around 3,000 years ago. These are two different issues, both of them could be affected by DNA, I am not certain how.

On a few occasions, I mentioned that it is possible the Genealogy of the Dragon Bloodline, Royal Scyths and current European Royals — MIGHT BE the descendants of these Cone Headed People. Although, this seems circumstantially “probable,” it is not provable as there is no direct evidence for the connection. Were the Cone Headed People themselves, actually trying to enslave the rest of Humanity? This would be VERY hard to prove, in a substantial manner.

---

Being is Not Physical, what is Physical is an Outward Expression of Being — this has Priority over Genetics, even though this topic is much more about biology

Following my usual Proviso: Just because someone looks a certain way, doesn’t mean you know their character.

As many of my readers know, I do NOT care about Race, Bloodlines, Cultural or Religious affiliations; those are in my opinion, voluntary associations based on your personal preference. Your Spiritual Identity is the REAL Inner Self, not the body. As an Individualist, I think you have an executive right to choose ‘what you do,’ how ‘you identify,’ as well as ‘who you associate with.’ No matter what the physical characteristics are, genetics or otherwise; Individuals are NOT defined by their bodies. A bloodline cannot determine the type of “Mental Pathology” one has. It’s entirely possible that a cone headed individual could have been perfectly friendly to be around; I will at least offer that as a possibility, even though I can’t prove it and most people wouldn’t accept it. I suspect they did view themselves as “Born to Rule;” but again, that’s only circumstantially probable.

---

Cone Headed or Elongated Skulls have been found world wide, so who or what were they?

— NO, they are NOT prehistoric Jews!

Asking the right questions can lead to correct answers:

Anthropological, paleontological records that we currently have, show these appeared sometime around [3,000] years ago; prior to that, they are nowhere to be found. A good question could be: “If they are naturally part of our evolutionary physiological development, ‘Why’ do they suddenly appear in our Anthropological record?”, “Are they some kind of “introduction?”

The remains shown are Naturally Elongated. The foreamen magnum is 1.5” further back than on regular human anatomy. This Morphological architecture is not NOT possible with ACD.

Observation is Key

First method of study; just pay close attention to what we can see; accounting for technical nuances, then make the necessary comparison to other known, yet similar organisms and structures. There are differences and similarities, “Elongated Skulls” have with the average Human bone structure.

Was it Artificial or Natural?

Artificial Cranial Deformation? — Nope

Hydrocephalus? — Nope

Just to specify; these remains are NOT the result of cranial deformation; at least not the oldest ones — THAT part is in my opinion, completely resolved. Yes, there are younger specimens less than 800 years old that DO have evidence of cranial deformation. According to researcher, Brien Foerster, regular people did attempt to ‘make’ themselves look like the “natural originals,” because apparently these originals were considered “Elite Rulers of a Divine Bloodline.” So, head binding DID take place, it was an attempt to emulate what was being admired. Even though this is a fact that; with careful nuance, Brian has established with very logical arguments; ‘Main Stream’ scientific community and indeed Academia as a whole, continue to prop up the false concept that ALL elongated skulls are the result of ‘cranial deformation.’ Academia asks everyone to just ignore the finer details; meanwhile they are completely unable to answer questions about those details.

Questions like:

“Does Cranial Deformation cause the Foreamen Magnum to be 1.5” further back than in regular humans?” And

“Does Cranial Deformation cause the individual to develop in such a way that there is no saggital suture?” And….. “Single parietal plate?”

“Does Cranial Deformation happen to unborn babies in utero in multiple instances?”

The excerpt from an abstract in the article below states that absence of the sagittal suture is not necessarily connected to skull shape:

Results: Of these 400 skulls, three specimens were found to have isolated absence of the sagittal suture (one child and two adults). None of these three skulls were found to have scaphocephaly as a result of the suture absence. No other malformations were found on any specimen. One clinical case is also presented with radiologic findings on the absence of the sagittal suture that also did not have resultant skull malformation.

Conclusions: The authors found that the isolated absence of the sagittal suture does not produce a scaphocephalic skull shape.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23263744/

Just to be fair, this is a link to the people who contest Brian Foerster:

https://ahotcupofjoe.net/2017/04/elongated-skulls-mystery-really-isnt-mystery/?referrer-analytics=1

Here’s a test, it’s based on Common Sense:

Fill a balloon with air and tie it off; then, force the balloon into a different shape, now does that cause the overall volume of the balloon to INCREASE, just because it now has a “deformation?” Of course not.

According to doctors who have expertise in Osteology, the volume of a developing skull will NOT be altered by attempts to alter the natural shape; the volume it will grow to, is determined by the DNA. The “Naturally Elongated” remains show 25% MORE cranial volume than regular Homo Sapiens. They are Not the result of hydrocephalus; the brain was in fact, firmly in place in all “inner surfaces” of the skull.

Here is a bit from Wikipedia on Artificial Cranial Deformation, just for some background:

Alchon kings [of the Huns] are generally recognized by their elongated skulls, a result of artificial skull deformation. Archaeologist Cameron Petrie wrote that "The depictions of elongated heads suggest that the Alchon kings engaged in skull modification, which was also practiced by the Hun groups that appeared in Europe."

This is a link for an article from NIH.gov: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132478/

Unfortunately, the NIH article leaves out some critical questions:

1. If Artificial Cranial Deformation (ACD) was “Ultimately intended to solidify [king Khingila and Akhenaten’s] power,” to set themselves apart from the rest as rulers, where did this peculiar ACD practice come from?

2. What was the ORIGINAL inspiration that if one has a ‘cone shaped head’ it meant they were legitimate divinely ordained rulers?

The article abstract states: “Both rulers laid claim to divinity, labeling themselves as gods amongst men.”

3. Why would ‘this’ make them “Superior?”

4. Why would having this physical characteristic make them ‘feel’ like they are Gods?

5. Why would this happen all over the world?

6. Why would regular people ever accept this?

7. Is this where the Arbitrary form of Hierarchy got started?

Artificial Cranial Deformation or ACD doesn’t account for ALL the Elongated Skulls found, so let’s focus on the ‘Natural Ones’

Here, I am going to address the presence of “Natural Cone Headed” individuals only.

In the past, I stated these remains belonged to a Scythian, Turkic origin, making them likely the original ancestors of the Khazarian Elite. Extensive genetic testing on these remains; from Paracas, Peru, have pointed to some specific Haplogroups in their mitochondrial as well as paternal DNA. This does confirm they are from the Ruling Elite of ancient Scythian culture known as Royal Scyths (see below) and that the regular people in that same Haplogroup did NOT have the cone headed feature. This effectively makes them into a separate Culture inside of an Existing Culture and they did not interbreed.

Black Sea area near the Caucasus mountains, are where the oldest of the remains (approximately 2,000 years old) have been found; the other primary area, is Paracas Peru where there is evidence of their presence for at least 1,600 years, give or take. Ancient Egyptian mural shown below is approximately 3,000 years old, illustrates cone headed people probably the Hapiru or Apiru.

Natural Cone Headed individuals are physiologically different from standard Human remains, yet are obviously related to Human kind.

Physical Differences are: ——— (This is not a complete list)

1. Cranial volume is up to 25 percent larger in some examples and 60 percent heavier than conventional human skulls.

2. Not the result of hydrocephalus, a brain wasting disease that shrinks the size of the brain; instead, it was firmly in place in all inner surfaces of the skull.

3. Only one parietal plate, rather than two, no sagittal suture.

4. Foreamen magnum is 1.5” further back than on regular human anatomy. That’s where the top of the spine connects to the base of the skull.

5. Foreamen minor, two small foreamen located at the top of the skull, not present in regular humans.

6. On full skeletons, there are one set of ribs less than in humans, in one example. Rib bones themselves are 1.2% wider than in Humans.

7. Neck is longer than regular humans.

8. Infants have elongated heads the size of their torso while in utero, based on discovered mummified remains in many instances.

---

Cone Headed Feature was likely exclusive to the Scythian Elite or Royal Scyths

Firestarter mentions the Ancestry of the Scythian People in several places in Dragon Court, this is from part 7:

According to Herodotus, the Scythians emerged from beyond the Euphrates, from across the Araxes, an Armenian river that borders Armenia, Iran and Azerbaijan. The Scythians first appear in Assyrian annals as Ishkuzai, related to the modern term Ashkenazi “Jews”, supposedly from Ashkenaz.
Many modern Iranians descend from Medes. Medes heritage today is claimed by groups in Iran, like Kurds, Lurs, Isfahan and the Turkic languages-speaking Azeri.

Esau was “red all over like a hairy garment”, and called Edom (red). According to Herodotus, the Scythians have “deep blue eyes, and bright red hair” and practiced ceremonies dedicated to Bacchus (the Greek Baal). The Scythians were warriors (instead of farmers). They "fought to live and lived to fight, and drank the blood of their enemies and used the scalps as napkins”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scythians

Firestarter Elaborates:

Wikipedia states that the term Scythian, like Cimmerian, referred to a variety of groups from the Black Sea to southern Siberia and central Asia - a variety of peoples. In this version, Scythians were nomads that lived in the steppes of which the west was near the Black Sea and in the east went all the way to Mongolia, the north of China (2,500 miles from east to west and between 200 and 600 miles from north to south). This would explain why Dragons are so important in Chinese culture.
This version might explain why De Vere would use a whole bunch of names to describe the “dragons”, which could refer to different types of people within the Scythians (dragons).
This would indicate that the area that I found as “Scythia” was only the west part of the area where the dragons (Scythians) lived. [Currently known as Ukraine]

The Scythians first appeared in the historical record in the 8th century BC; Heroditus reported 3 versions of the origins of the Scythians. Ancient Greek historians wrote about Scythians who lived north of the Black Sea and the Caucasus Mountains.
In the 7th century BC the Scythians with the Cimmerians frequently raided the Middle East.
Wikipedia dates the Scythians from about the 9th century until the 1st century BC, but doesn’t make clear what happened after that.
The classical Scythians may have disappeared by the 1st century BC, but Eastern Romans continued to speak of "Scythians" for Germanic tribes or mounted Eurasian nomadic barbarians.

There are results of DNA calculators that confirm a link between the Iranic speaking people of South-Central Asia, the people of the northern regions of West Asia and Eastern Europeans.
The western Scythians were ruled by a wealthy class known as the Royal Scyths. The Scythians controlled a vast trade network connecting Greece, Persia, India and China.
Iron Age Scythians were a mix of Yamnaya people from the Russian Steppe and East Asian populations, similar to the Han and the Nganasan (from northern Siberia).
The Scythians used cannabis to induce trance and divination.

From large burial mounds (up to 20 metres high) we have learned about Scythian life and art. Scythian tombs reveal traces of Greek, Chinese, and Indian craftsmanship. These burial mounds were named kurhán or kurgán, from the Turkic word for "castle” (which indicates a Turkish origin…).

Here’s a PDF on the study of ancient nomadic cultures in Eurasia (2002): http://www.geochronometria.pl/pdf/geo_21/geo21_17.pdf

For Further reading on the specifics of “Scythian Culture” please see:

Dragon Court part 5 and the Scythian Connection Armenian Serpent, Tribe of Dan

---

The Elongated Heads and DNA testing

“The Truth Wins” publication has an interesting article:

http://thetruthwins.com/archives/dna-results-for-the-nephilim-skulls-in-peru-are-in-and-the-results-are-absolutely-shocking

Here are some excerpts from the article written by Michael Snyder:

“As noted, it is researcher Brien Foerster that has been leading the charge in reviving interest in these elongated skulls.  Now that the DNA results are in, interest in these skulls is almost certainly going to skyrocket.  The following quote from the geneticist that conducted the DNA analysis comes from Brien Foerster’s Facebook page.  Please keep in mind that this geneticist was not told the history of these skulls in advance.  So he was able to examine them without any preconceived notions.  What he found was absolutely shocking… He states:”

“Whatever the sample labeled 3A has came from – it had mtDNA with mutations unknown in any human, primate or animal known so far. The data is very sketchy though and a LOT of sequencing still needs to be done to recover the complete mtDNA sequence. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample 3A indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans.”

Snyder continues:

“As I have written about previously, forensic analysis of these skulls show that they were not deformed by “cradle-boarding”.  There are many examples of skulls that have been “cradle-boarded” down in South America, but the skulls that Foerster has been investigating are much different from those.  The following is more from April Holloway about these remains…”

The cranial volume is up to 25 percent larger and 60 percent heavier than conventional human skulls, meaning they could not have been intentionally deformed through head binding/flattening. They also contain only one parietal plate, rather than two. The fact that the skulls’ features are not the result of cranial deformation means that the cause of the elongation is a mystery, and has been for decades. [There are other anatomical features that could NEVER be caused by cranial deformation]

Snyder Continues:

“In fact, in a previous article I discussed how a sample of red hair from one of these skulls was sent to a lab to be analyzed.  The tests on that sample of hair also showed that these skulls are not human.”

---

Don’t believe Cranial ‘Disinformation’

Brien Foerster has many videos like this 2 minute one on YouTube, he describes very eloquently the issue of the head binded verses the “natural elongated” heads:

Some Evidence they were infiltrators in Ancient Egypt

They were NOT only in Eurasia and Peru, they were likely in many places in ancient times; I was completely floored when I found this mural shown below, from ancient Tau Wei (Egypt). I snapped this image from the Brien Foerster video below. I can only pickup on a little bit of the description from the original writing, as some parts are too blurred to read, it appears “tributes,” were being offered to a prince. I can’t make out any names here, so it makes dating this mural difficult. I will continue to work on interpreting the message. What’s most relevant is the depiction itself, the artist for the mural obviously made an effort to provide an accurate image of these interlopers. These murals were drawn with more accuracy than what they are credited to have, there could be some artistic license, but exactly “what” is the artist trying to express? The shapes of the heads are clearly, very close in appearance to the remains we see of the Elongated Heads, in my view there are no coincidences.

Here is the video that I snapped the image from; it is a bit longer; approx 31 minutes, but it is a discussion about possible ways these Cone Heads fit into the more recent history we are familiar with:

Cone Heads vs Head Cones, mimicry is some times thought to be the highest form of Flattery

It’s also worth noting the practice to emulate the physical appearance of the “natural cone heads” may have been an ongoing thing in Egypt:

Many “Archeologist” used to discount the murals as “just art” portraying beautiful women wearing a cone shaped object on top of their heads. Up until recently, there had been no discoveries of physical examples ever found. As it turns out, there were definitely “Head Cones” being worn, made from a scented wax. It’s probably not a coincidence that these “Head Cones” were meant to portray something…..

Here’s an excavation where one such cone was found buried with a woman who wore it. There may be other examples found in the future:

Here’s another scene, beautiful young ladies dancing, musicians have head cones:

Facial reconstruction of Natural Cone Heads by Marcia K. Moore:

So, what did the Real Cone Heads look like? Here is a good resource that I found involved in facial reconstruction, Marcia K. Moore’s website: https://www.marciakmooreciamarstudio.com/home

Marcia Moore made the reconstruction based on this skull having come from Peru, nearly all mummified remains on elongated skulls have Red Hair and are not native to North America, this has been a source of controversy.

Marcia has modeled these in clay as well as in digital rendering:

https://www.marciakmooreciamarstudio.com/forensic-reconstructions

Courtesy of Marcia K Moore https://www.marciakmooreciamarstudio.com/home

Courtesy of Marcia K Moore https://www.marciakmooreciamarstudio.com/home

Here is Brien Foerster with a full lecture on the study of these Elongated Skulls:

It’s approx 54 minutes. He provides analysis of the DNA data he collected, at 45 min. mark. A big issue the mainstream science has about the DNA results; because of where the Haplogroups come from, changes the narrative of when migration happened from Eurasia. It upsets the old Bering Straight story.

Haplogroups show the Naturally Elongated remains come from Crimea, the Caspian Sea and The Black Sea area:

Note: the Haplogroups coming from the same area where the Scythian culture originates is key in my own suspicions that they are connected to the Royal Scyths and the Dragon Bloodline. Iron Age Scythians were a mix of Yamnaya people from the Russian Steppe and East Asian populations, similar to the Han and the Nganasan (from northern Siberia). Cimmerian are also in these Haplogroups.

U2e1————U2e

H1 ———— H

K ————— H1———— H2a

T2b ———— J1b1 ——— R

There were a small number of them that had group B native to Peru.

Cone Headed people were likely the Royal Scyths mentioned above by Firestarter and they are apparently still around:

This Cone head works as a Banker in Spain

---

Are the Cone Heads ‘Aliens?’ — Nope, — this is a popular ‘idea’ however, I don’t buy it, there’s something different going on

Do Extraterrestrials exist? Yes, of course they do, but why would they come here? How could something that evolved on another world even survive Here?

Aliens are a branch off of this original topic of physiology, maybe even a distraction. Direct Alien Intervention via physically coming to Earth and attempting to asset strip our planet; though it might be very very unlikely, doesn’t seem “impossible.” Even though it’s the most talked about possibility of what might have happened; chances for this really being true are next to nil.

The Possibility of Extraterrestrial Intervention via Nature

An Object of True Extraterrestrial Origin, like Oumuamua could have crashed and spread a pathogen that caused mutation. This could be much more likely, in light of the object found on the bottom of the Baltic Sea in 2011.

Baltic Undersea Mount, is shown in side-scan sonar to be sliced in half by extreme kinetic force

View of the object that was discovered on the bottom of the Baltic Sea, came to rest a mile away from the undersea mount it had sliced in half; Obvious Crash Site.

Mutagenic Agents

Biological contamination might be able to cause genetic mutations to a minimal degree; resulting from parasitic or bacterial infection. This COULD come from a true Extraterrestrial Source but it doesn’t have to and some naturally occurring toxins could also be mutagenic. We seem to be manufacturing a lot of things that causes harm to our bodies, like nanotechnology that can be controlled by 5G frequencies.

Hybridization and it’s Genetic Affects

Genetic alteration can also come from a Hybridization event, involving two slightly different populations in the same genus, causing a temporary change in physical appearance that doesn’t last for more than a few generations. As an example, a Tiger and a Lion can produce a genetically viable offspring called a “Liger,” it can become much larger than either of the parents. Hybridization and it’s results vary depending on what species we are talking about. This possibility is in my opinion, the most likely source for the “Natural Cone Headed” feature. Please see the Robert Sepehr video below.

Why I don’t Say “Aliens” —

The perpetual insistence that “Aliens” are all Bi-Pedal Humanoids; like in Star Trek, is ridiculously absurd. Our “body plan” would NOT likely be repeated on an Alien World. Life on other worlds would not look like us at all, having developed in environs so completely different. Hybridization between Human and “Alien” would of course never happen. The genetics we have on this planet; having 4 base pairs in the DNA, would likely not work with actual extraterrestrial DNA. How many base pairs would Extraterrestrial DNA have? Nobody even knows.

Our History is actually very complex. There is a story of people, their movements and events as well as advanced knowledge that has been either lost or hidden from common knowledge. Not everything is easy to explain, a few new mysteries actually makes life ever more interesting. If I make a post on the topic of Aliens, I will do my best to address the Extraterrestrial concept with a more unconventional angle.

This Robert Sepehr Video below, explores the concept of “Hybridization” and why that should be taken into account more than most other ideas.

Summary

Whatever they are, the people who had “Elongated Heads,” along with other significant physiological differences from the regular human population, have left their mark and a truly interesting mystery for us all to puzzle over. I still suspect the specific DNA and whatever traces of their influence will be found in higher concentrations in Ashkenazi populations; people who share the same Haplogroup originating from what is now known as Ukraine. This may be in much greater concentrations within “consciously exclusive isolated” groups like the Sabbatean Parasitic Elites and Black Nobility who continue to intermarry in the same bloodlines, desiring to preserve their “godly traits” from “genetic pollution.” These same Haplogroups have also left their mark on the populations of the South American Indians closest to the original Inca people, as noted by Brian Foester; this has upset the Orthodox Paleontologist views of when the first influx of people started to happen into the “Americas.”