Dragon Court, Order of the Garter and the continuation of the Knights Templar of London part 9

Order of the Garter has had a lot of influence, it is one of the ways City of London became powerful enough to Rule the Royals. Influence was from the Private side of the Public / Private framework.

This post is free to share if you are inclined.

An interesting anecdote to start with:

Order of the Garter was behind Hitler’s rise to power

Order of the Garter has had some very strong influences on political events; here’s a good example: Adolf Hitler was aided and supported by 10 Knights of the Garter.

Here are their names,

1. Edward VIII, King of the UK (KG in 1911)

2. Prince Charles Edward (KG in 1902, annulled in 1915 or 1919?)

3. Charles Vane-Tempest-Stewart (KG in 1919)

4. Edward Wood (KG in 1931)

5. Victor Emmanuel III, King of Italy (KG in 1891, annulled in 1941)

6. Hirohito, Emperor of Japan (KG in 1929, annulled in 1941, restored as KG in 1971)

7. Gustaf V, King of Sweden (KG in 1905)

8. Paul, Prince Regent of Yugoslavia (KG in 1939)

9. Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands (KG in 1944)

10. Queen Juliana of the Netherlands (KG in 1958)

There are many stories from history that reference the Order of the Garter, I suppose that those stories do lend a degree of social acceptance for them in the general sense. Firestarter documents some of those stories in the lower half of this post.

The rise of Adolf Hitler to power in Germany was part of a long plan established in 1880; the World Wars were choreographed and “managed” by these Elites who were members of the Garter, they were working for the Black Nobility in London.

Firestarter states:

I was looking for more information on the European aristocrats that supported the German Nazis: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/vie...7&p=5573#p5572

I looked in particular for the predecessors of Montagu Norman and Otto von Habsburg.


The Order of the Garter is the continuation of the Knights Templar of London, who covertly manage the City of London Corporation which was founded by Templars.

The ascendants of Montagu Norman, include the Montagu family are that came from Italy before settling in France. They became British Peers around 1149 and further gained baronages through serving King Edward III of England.
The Montagu family are British Peers with dukedoms all over the United Kingdom. The Montagu, Douglas, Scott, and Percy families are all intermarried and claim to be related to Normans which claim to be relatives of Norsemen.
The Percy family came to England in the 11^th century. They have bloodline relations to Saxons, Anglicans, and the originally Turkish-Scythian Alans which settled in France around the 5th century.

The Founding of the Order of the Garter:

William de Montagu (a.k.a. William de Montacute), 2nd Earl of Salisbury, 4th Baron Montagu, King of Man was a founding Knight of the Order of the Garter.
See his Coat of arms, with the triskelion that was adopted in the Coat of arms of Man.

The House of Montagu is deeply involved in merchant banking and are strong supporters of British-Zionism while posing as “anti-Zionists”. The Montagu family originally established the Bank of England for the British Crown.

A Bankster Family more powerful than the Rothschild Family:

The Montagu Barons have even greater international influences in banking than the Rothschild family as the co-founders of the Bank of England and connections with HSBC and their Norman agents’ connections to the Bank for International Settlements. The Montagus are Roman Catholic. [Likely they are Black Nobility]

Walter Montagu was a secret agent working with the Medicis in France and the Vatican. Charles Montagu, the 1st Earl of Halifax, worked at the Crown’s Treasury and after developing the Bank of England he became the Chancellor of the Exchequer. The Montagu family of Manchester own the British Cheetham Hill Gang crime firm.

The Montagus of Manchester established residences in Australia. Sharp End International is a private military company in Australia and New Zealand.
HSBC recently incorporated The Montagu’s of Swaythling’s Samuel Montagu & Co. into their multibillion dollar private equity firm called the Montagu Private Equity under HSBC which manages about 5 billion in assets.

Individuals who are the Black Nobility or Dragon members and even the Knights of the Garter, many are also “Private Equity Owners” and “Trustors” the assets that are held are Titulary Claims, Land Patents in Allodium and they are the “Stock Owners” of Corporate Shares, they may also have direct interest in Cede & Co. However, I would need to verify that.

Count Gustaf Douglas from the Scottish Douglas clan is a Swedish billionaire noble.

The head of the Percy family is Duke Ralph Percy and has the same grandfather as Duke Richard Montagu-Douglas-Scott. His sons are Earl of Percy, George Percy, and Max Ralph Percy who married Princess Nora Oettingen-Spielberg of Germany.
Barbara Bush was born a Pierce and is closely related with the Percy family which formerly used the name Pierce-Eye. Charles “Don Carlos” Percy of the Percy family established Trail Lake Plantation in the South of the US which intermarried with the Walker family, like the Bush, Pierce and Walker families have intermarried.
The Walkers were slave traders and the Percy family owned slaves. US President Franklin Pierce was a cousin of the slave owning Percy’s and was against ending slavery:

https://ahuwahzeus583992924.wordpres...anking-cartel/

(archived here: http://archive.is/Sxh95)

An interesting story is that (another) founding Knight of the Garter, Thomas de Holland, at 24 married the 11-year old Joan Plantagenet in 1339. Joan was the daughter of Edmund, earl of Kent, granddaughter of Edward I and cousin of King Edward III.
Then, while Thomas was fighting abroad, Joan married again in February 1341 to William de Montagu.

After Thomas de Holland had made a name for himself, and became a Knight of the Garter, in 1348, he petitioned the papal court to confirm the validity of his marriage and have Joan returned to him. Joan testified that the marriage had been “consummated” almost immediately after the wedding ceremony.
In November 1349, the Pope annulled Joan’s marriage to Montagu and she was ordered back to Holland.

After De Holland died, Joan, would marry “Black Prince” Edward IV, and their son would be crowned in 1377 as King Richard II:

https://historytheinterestingbits.co...lliam-montagu/

Of the 9 (I thought only 8!) Holy Roman Emperors that were also Knights of the Garter; 8 were of the House of Habsburg.

Albert the Magnanimous (Albert V) was King of Hungary, Croatia, Bohemia and Germany, Duke of Luxembourg and, Archduke of Austria – and Knight of the Garter since 1438.

Frederick III was the first emperor of the House of Habsburg and the third member of the House of Habsburg to be “elected” King of Germany – and Knight of the Garter since 1457.

Maximilian I ruled jointly with his father from ca. 1483 to his father's death in 1493. Maximilian expanded the influence of the House of Habsburg through war and his marriage in 1477 to the heiress to the Duchy of Burgundy – and Knight of the Garter since 1489.

Charles V was Archduke of Austria, Duke of Burgundy (including part of the Netherlands and France) and ruler of Spain (including part of Italy). He brought under his rule extensive territories in West, Central and South Europe and the Spanish viceroyalties in the Americas and Asia. He was the heir of Habsburg of Austria, Valois of Burgundy and Trastámara of Spain (the Crowns of Castile and Aragon). Through Castile he owned part of the Americas and Asia – and Knight of the Garter since 1508 (at only 8 years?).
See Charles’ Coat of arms.

Notice the consistent use of Double Headed Eagle Heraldry and the Garter that encircles the shield; the Garter going around the shield represents the continuity or infinity of power. The symbol of the King or ruler is the armor shown above the shield. With the double headed eagle “supporting” the power hierarchy, the two heads indicate power is also “occulted,” therefore a fraud, the armor is there to enforce that fraud. Oddly, there is another double headed eagle above the position of the armor, so it is above the King….. Another “Upper Order.” Hier — Archy, I wonder who that is supposed to be….

Ferdinand I was King of Hungary, Croatia and Bohemia – and Knight of the Garter since 1522.

Rudolf II was King of Hungary, Croatia, Bohemia and Archduke of Austria – and Knight of the Garter since 1587.

Maximilian II was King of Hungary, Croatia andBohemia – and Knight of the Garter since 1567.

Francis II (1768 – 1835) was the last Holy Roman Emperors from 1792 to 1806, when he dissolved the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation, after being defeated by Napoleon. In 1804, he became the first Emperor of Austria. He was also Apostolic King of Hungary andBohemia – and Knight of the Garter since 1814.


Other Knights of the Garter of the House of Habsburg (that weren’t crowned Holy Roman emperor) include.

Philip I (1478 – 1506) was the first was the first King of Castile (by marriage) of the House of Habsburg, he inherited the greater part of the Duchess of Burgundy (including part of the Netherlands). The son of Maximilian I and father of Emperor Charles V – and Knight of the Garter since 1503.

Franz Joseph I (1830 – 1916) was Emperor of Austria and Monarch to many states of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, including King of Hungary – and Knight of the Garter since 1867.

Rudolf (1858 – 1889) died before he could follow in the footsteps of his father Franz Joseph I by suicide – and Knight of the Garter since 1887.

Archduke Franz Ferdinand (1863 – 1914) was never crowned. His assassination has been called the reason for WW I – and Knight of the Garter since 1902.

Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands (like her mother Juliana was) is a Stranger Lady of the Garter, her son King Willem-Alexander became a Knight of the Garter earlier this year.
King Felipe VI of Spain and his predecessor, Juan Carlos I, are concurrently Stranger Knights of the Garter.

See Juan Carlos second from left, Beatrix second from right, and King Harald V of Norway on the far right, front row. In the centre of the front row: Philip, Elizabeth and Charles, at the Garter ceremony in 2002.

Another interesting story is of the Dutch King of Britain from 1689 to 1702, William of Orange (Willem van Oranje in Dutch), who had become a Knight of the Garter in 1653.

See William of Orange and the Glorious Revolution of 1688, in the following post by Will Zoll:

1871 – Part III This stack is absolutely excellent I very strongly recommend Prussia Gate all posts by Will Zoll are intensive and chocked full of info on a “micro dynamic level.” This is when The City of London became powerful enough to rule the Royals.

He was never King of the Netherlands though: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...d-history.html

The first King of the Netherlands, King William I, was effectively made king in 1815 after the invasion by the French under Napoleon Bonaparte made him popular, he had become a Knight of the Garter in 1814

Tsar Alexander I of Russia, who became a Knight of the Garter in 1813, played a central role in making William the first king of the Netherlands: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willia...he_Netherlands

Napoleon’s nephew and heir, Napoleon III, became a Knight of the Garter in 1855.
See Queen Victoria knighting Emperor of France Napoleon III at the Garter ceremony, 18 April 1855.

Garter – Girdle there are a few stories

The official tale on the founding of the Order of the Garter is something like - that the countess of Salisbury Joan of Kent, Edward´s cousin and daughter-in-law, dropped her garter when dancing at a ball. King Edward III picked it up, put it on his own leg and uttered “Honi soit qui mal y pense”.
Edward III then said that even knights should be honoured to wear that garter, and so founded the Order of the Garter.
This tale was first written in 1360, so after the Order was founded.

According to Nicholas de Vere the Garter is really just another tail eating snake (Ouroborus).
I think that both explanations are wrong and at the very least don’t explain why St. George is the patron saint of the Order of the Garter...

There is a third explanation that involves a late 14 century poem, involving Knight Gawain, the Green knight and a girdle that ends with “honi soit qui mal y pense”.
As this poem was written AFTER the Order of the Garter was founded in 1348, this couldn’t be an explanation either: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Ga...e_Green_Knight


The best explanation I found is from the tale of St. George...
St. George is the patron saint of a number of countries, including: England, Portugal, Georgia, Lithuania, and Greece.

St. George is believed to have been born in Cappadocia (in Turkey) and was born in the second half of the 3rd century AD.
He served as a soldier in the Roman army. In protest against the persecution of Christians by Roman Emperor Diocletian (244-311) at the beginning of the 4th century, St. George resigned from his military office.
When St. George tore up the emperor’s order against the Christians, Diocletian had him imprisoned and tortured. George refused to reject his Christian faith, so he was dragged through the streets of Diospolis (a.k.a. Lydda) in Palestine and beheaded.
See the 15^th century painting (note the halo).

The most popular tale of St. George involves slaying a dragon. St. George is most commonly depicted as a knight mounted on a horse and spearing a dragon.
The best known form of this legend is in the “Legenda Aurea”, written by archbishop of Genoa Jacobus de Voragine in the 13th century.

Beside the city Silene in Libya was a pond with a “dragon which envenomed all the country”. The people of the city fed the beast 2 sheep each day. The people of the city also sacrificed humans to it.
St. George passed Silene one day, when the king’s daughter would be offered to the dragon. When St. George heard about it and saw the princess; he decided to slay the beast:

Thus as they spake together the dragon appeared and came running to them, and S. George was upon his horse, and drew out his sword and garnished him with the sign of the cross, and rode hardily against the dragon which came towards him, and smote him with his spear and hurt him sore and threw him to the ground.
And after said to the maid: Deliver to me your girdle [belt], and bind it about the neck of the dragon and be not afeard. When she had done so the dragon followed her as it had been a meek beast and debonair.

St. George then then slayed the dragon and converted the king and his people to the Christian faith.
In another tale, during the First Crusade, St. George is said to have helped the crusaders during their successful siege of Antioch in 1098: https://www.ancient-origins.net/hist...-dragon-005794
(archived here: http://archive.is/gWtWk)

I guess that you won´t be surprised that I think that the garter represents the girdle that was bound around the dragon´s neck...

A Dragon whose neck was bound by the Garter of a Princess became therefore tame. The wild nature of the dragon became tame by being bound to the morality of the Princess. This is similar to symbolism found in ancient Celtic stories as well as in their symbolism.

The god of the forest Cernunnos is depicted as a man sitting cross legged with the head of a Megaloceros (Irish Elk) in place of a human head, with it’s great long antlers. The antlers themselves look a lot like the wings of a Dragon. His left hand holds a snake representing the wild inner nature of man, while the corresponding ankle has an anklet to keep it bound. This symbolizes Moral Constraint. The right hand is holding an anklet removed from the right ankle, this symbolizes Liberation and Individual Freedom. Together this whole picture illustrates man’s true sense of Self Discipline, thus balanced with Nature.

Megaloceros skull and Antlers

Cernunnos god of the Forest

For reference on Cernunnos:

https://historycooperative.org/cernunnos/

Here is a little from the article:

Whatever role Cernunnos had in the lives of early Celts and Gauls remains as nothing more but speculation. Nonetheless, worship of Cernunnos was so widespread that the Christian church may have drawn inspiration from the deity to depict the goat-like Satan.

More or less, early Christians took one look at the horned god and went “nope, none for us, thanks.” So intense was the detest of pagan deities, that Christianity went ahead and demonized most (if not all) of them. Cernunnos was among the long, long list of gods that didn’t make the cut into the up-and-coming monotheistic religion.

Mentioned above is the “goat-like Satan,” the author is referring to Baphomet, another major symbolic figure that is completely misunderstood by BOTH Christians and their supposed opposites, the Satanist. Symbols and deep meanings can be hijacked for agendas they were never intended for. So now, we can look at Dragons in a different light, are Dragons by themselves Evil? My answer is of course NO, in fact a dragon can stand for inner spiritual vitality. The symbolism used by the Dragon and Order of the Garter, by itself is not terrible, even “occult” concepts are not terrible; what IS terrible is the Fraud these Parasites of London have perpetrated against civilization.